When The Pope John Paul the second elected (1921-2005) for Vatican as The Great Pontiff for the Catholic Church, the Greatest Christian church (1.1 milliard) when he looked from the terrace of St. Peter's Basilica to his people from on 16/10/1979, he declared that "The Messiah is the Solution" and he persuaded to Christianize the Culture to confront the contemporary Western Christians which fringed by Secular Christianity which made those who believe in the presence of God in Europe not exceed than 14% from the total number of its people and those who went to church not exceed than 10%. This percent is in France, the Greatest of Catholic European countries not exceed than 5% (i.e. less than the French Muslims!!).
In confronting this situation, is to counteract that prevailing direction to dying out of Christianity and the Christians!
Concerning the external relation of The Vatican, The Pope and its church activated in many directions. From it:
On 1991, the Pope thanked Capitalism of The Free Market and declared that on the level of Single Countries and the international Relations, the Free Market is the most activated instrument for using the imports and the active responding to the needs and agreed to the legality of the role of the gain as an indication to success of a company or not and he battled Freedom and its priests in Latin America, those whom wanted to give a preceding Social Role for Christianity and the Bible.
Within the framework of The Vatican in directing the religious role in the Cold War, several decisions had been declared from The Vatican Council on the sixtieth of the 20th century to attract Muslims under banners of Catholic Dialogues with non-Muslims and made the contemporary Jews innocent from the blood of The Messiah!
2. On the direction to become close to Jews-submitted to the Jewish exploitation and with a stretched hand to the union of The Catholic Church with American Imperialism and the Protestant Christianity (The Zionistic Christianity) and for the role of the Jews in the Cold War against Communism, the Vatican began to (direct to cultivate The Messiah in Israel) and talking about him as a Jew!
The Pope John Paul the second for the anniversary of Atonement on 20/4/1984 declared that Or-shaleem is the motto of Israeli Nation. For this he said: From the time of David whom made Or-shaleem as a Capital of his Kingdom and after him was his son Soleiman whom built the Temple. From that on, Or-shaleem is the home of a profound Love in the hearts of the Jews whom were not forget its commemoration, and still their hearts hanged to that Love of Or-shaleem and they saw or-shaleem as a motto of their home.
John Paul the second is the first Pope to visit a Jewish hermitage on 1986.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
In 1993, Vatican resumed diplomatic relations with Zionistic Nation on 31-12-1993 quoted:" The unique relations with Vatican and the Jewish people!" with an inclusion of a confirmatory believe even for Catholic Arabs, in this unique relation with Zionistic Presentation"!!
On March 2000, the Pope visited Israel and presented an apology and compunction, it was not preceded before by The Infallible Greatest pontiff!! To Jews for what had been made before by the Catholics concerning the Zionistic rights -anti-Semitic- by the Christians. The Pope wrote it and put it in a rift in the Wailing Wall in Or-shaleem. He called for forgiving sins of Catholic Church be done against Jewish rights!
In 2004, the Pope receive the Great rabbis in Vatican and said-in the presence of the Great Rabbi- of Western Jewish Group ( Maier Lao: "Every place I visit, I always said: we must –as human beings- to care about the future generations of Great Brothers"..!!
The Pope John Paul the second visited Egypt and Syria (2000). In Egypt, the priests of Saint Catherine's Monastery in Sinai hindering him from entrance to pray inside, they are Roman Orthodoxy, but he was non-Christian in their point of believe. The Pope prayed in the street in front of the monastery. While Imam of Al-Azhar receive him in the airport and opened the doors of Holy Azhar.
When the Pope visited Syria, the president Bashar El-Asad accompanied him into The Great Umayyad Mosque. The Pope visited the tomb of the prophet John (PBUH)[John the Baptist]. The Pope refused to visit the tomb of Salah Eddin Ibn Ayyub (The Kurdish)[532-589AD/1137-1193AC) in spite of his presence inside The Umayyad Mosque. He did not want it appeared as assign of apology to Muslims for Crusades.
On time of John Paul the second, all cardinals appointed in the Catholic Church again and a new Catholic Church formed and a wave of panic prevailed from innovation. The German Cardinal Joseph Aloisins Ratzinger is the one who is responsible for that wave. He served for 25 years (from 1981 till his lection as the Pope Benedict XVI on April 2005, as Prefect of the sacred congregation for doctrine of Faith formerly known as the "Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office, historical Inquisition and the post of the Dean of College of Cardinals. Under his direction, he narrowed the dimensions of the permitted Schism and all of whom doubted that they tried to subvert Religion, he will to come to Rome for questioning. The Pope declared that ten of the Cardinals were not good enough to teach the Catholics. He ordered others to revise their books.
In 2000, "Friendship with Jesus Christ" is a frequent theme of preaching like his predecessor, Pope John Paul the second. He called that The Roman Catholic Church is the only Real Church for Jesus the Messiah and the Atonement is only for Catholics. It means, he is against the religious Multiplicity in Christianity. Benedict XVI is theologically conservative and his teaching and prolific writings defend traditional catholic doctrine and values.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
By the death of Pope John Paul II on April 2005, most of the great officers lost their jobs in Vatican. No one still there but few from them:
1-Cardinal Afsben Edwardo who announced the death of thr Pope and he worked as the transformer manager.
2-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, whom led the Mass of Requiem, a eulogy detailing the life and works of the Pope.
On selecting Pope Benedict XVI, who chose this name carrying his style of thinking as Benedict XIV (1740-1758) who was the enemy of Lightening and Reasoning. Benedict V (480-547) was the priest and the Pope whom establish the Western Monasticism which guarantee rooting of Christianity in the West at the time.
In 2004, the Pope Benedict XVI –before papacy- from his position as the strongest Man in Vatican quoted his refusal of Turkey's gathering to the European Union because it is a Muslim country!!
On describing the funeral of the pope (April, 2005), newsweek magazine on 19-4-2005 said we ask for a Pope who confront (Islam) because the International Terrorism (Islam) will make the Communism of the Eastern Bloc as new as the white-black television! And Islam which be looked at in its dual form (the Original and the Contemporary) needs a great Pontiff has a good theological and diplomatic knowledge. The new Pope must react with Islam in Europe, because the Muslim immigrants and their off springs now are a great social, religious new power has not the like before. With this news week declaration, it was declared the new missions burdened by the Pope in the New Stage. The role of the ex-Pope in the Cold War against Communism is not comparable to the asked for role from the present Pope who announcing war on Islam.
i. After the papacy of Ratzinger (Pope Benedict XVI), he cancelled the committee of Religious Dialogue and called it "Cultural Dialogue" on applying his preaching "Friendship with Jesus the Christ" which refuses appearance of other real religions except Catholicism.
ii. He cancelled publishing of "Islamo-christiana" magazine! And when he received Muslims representatives in Cologne-Germany, he said to them:"Muslims must take off animosity from their hearts and confront forms of fanaticism and all deeds of violence"!!
iii. He received on December 2005, the Italian journalist, Oriana Fallaci, whom is famous for her Racism and aggressive writings and animosity against Islam and Muslims!
iv. On 18-4-2006, an article in the French Journal, Le monde, by Henry Tenk, in it he said that the Pope is busied himself with "Advancement of Islam ". He said:" Islam is not a religion of Monotheism as Judaism and Christianity … . It is not related to the same revelation itself of which Jusaism and Christianity related to".
v. He authored combined to the Italian writer "Bera" a book titled "Uprooted-The West-Relativism-Islam and Christianity" declared in it that he is afraid of three things:
1- Retreat of the range of the newborn in Christian Europe and many nations especially the Germans, Italians and Spanish, may be will not be on earth at the end of this century, or may become a minority inside their nations.
2- Whom replace these Christian-European extinct nations are Muslim immigrants from Africa and the whole Arabic world, a worthy matter that Europe will become a part of Islamic Nation in the 21st century.
3- The exchange of Christianity of most of the Europeans just only ties with Christian families once upon a time.
On the side of Jews, Pope Benedict XVI walk on the same footsteps of his predecessor Pope John Paul II which is to strengthen relations with Jews and respond to its exploitation …The way of "Cultivating The Messiah in Israel" instead of pursuit behind Jews to acknowledge with Christianity and The Messiah!!..
It seems that the Great Pontiff of Catholicism –he has a history in Nazi Military- will consider the Jewish exploitation for him of this history of his. He talked about them as "Dear Brothers" as Pope John Paul II, whom called them "The Great Brothers"!! Not only this, but also Pope Benedict XVI write a book about Mary (the mother of Jesus Christ) and give it the title "The Daughter of Zionism".
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
If a weaken or ignorant or betrayed by Religious Dialogues of Vatican with Muslims, shocked by this situation of the Pope against Islam, Vatican's situation is but only application of the theme "Friendship with Jesus", which confined the Religion of Heavens then salvation only in Catholicism.
Vaticanous Dialogue with Muslims is the only efforts of the Catholic Church to drag Muslims to the Cold War on account of the West (Religious West) against (Secular Communism), then no companies or collaborators made for Religious Dialogue except only in the Islamic Nations walk on the same way Capitalistic Western Camp.
Vatican is always, for years of this dialogue in all its conferences, still fixed upon its religious situation which cannot acknowledge neither that Islam is a religion of Heavens, nor the Prophet of Islam (PBUH) as a prophet and a messenger.., nor by the Qur'an as Godly revelation. Vatican sorts Islam within man-made religions- i.e. Religious Cultures –like Buddhism, Hinduism, and Zoroastrianism and seated the delegations of Muslims beside those delegations of non-heavenly religions!!
On times of demanding acknowledge Islam as a Godly and heavenly religion, Vatican and the international Church Council, inevitably and openly, refuse to do this as what happened in the Islamic Christian Dialogue conference in Sheraton Heliopolis-Cairo on 28,29 October 2001 by an invitation of "International Forum for Dialogue" in Gedda and the World Islamic Conference. Vaticanous agent, Khaled Aksha, the priest, and the International Church Council's agent, Dr. Tarek Metri, refused signing on the final declaration because it contains the phrase : "Heavenly religions and Godly values", with saying : "We are not acknowledge that Islam is a heavenly religion and its Islamic values"!!. This announcement was repeatedly openly on the tongue of the Catholic priest, Christian Vanicin, on the recorded, published dialogue on the Arabic department from Cairo Office on Sunday, 17-9-2006 on "The talk of the mean time" program, live on BBC when he said: We are not acknowledged Islam as a heavenly religion.
By this, the Pope Benedict XVI begins his campaign "Frightening from Islam" as a result of drawback of religion which he was confronted with in Europe and the west. The contemporary Christians drawback corresponding to the contemporary rising of Islam as yearly statistics: In America 20000 become Muslims in spite of narrowness confronts Islam after 11th September, 2001. In Europe, yearly about 23058 become Muslims with daily range of 67. While those who believe in God in all Europe 14%. Those whom go to the mass in France- the largest Christian European country was only 5%. It means, Islam in France (5,000.000) is the first religion there.
About Churches, the number of the priests decrease, they abandon celibacy. In Europe, there is one priest for 1200 person, while in Africa, one priest for 4000. Prevailing of homosexuality is between religious men and children. FBI opened files of homosexuals of Catholic Churches to press over Vatican and exploit it when Vatican opposes attack of Iraq on 2003.
In North America, people whose go the Sunday mass were reduced by 40% than in the fifties of the 20th century. Only the third of them was continuing coming, where this number was doubled since a generation time before.
70% of American Catholics permit using preventatives of pregnancy against the Church. 70% of Roman Catholics permit sexual relations before marriage! The governments of Latin America agree upon the law of divorce and in supporting women in abortion. The exchange from Catholicism to Protestantism and Evangelical churches is increased between nations of Latin America.
Previewing by Gallop company on April, 2005, 70% from Catholics dealing in morals according their conscience not according to commands of the Church and only 20% dealing morally according the Church.
Facing this cotemporary Christianity which annoys Vatican and the Pope, Islam presented itself excellent with its solutions.
In South Africa, the most rich country of the black continent, 50% are suffering from AIDS (the cotemporary plague) while in Somalia, there is no even traces of this plague. Somalia is the poorest Muslim country in the continent. Also, Muslims of South Africa are not suffering from it.
In the Christian Western nations where societies of high-ranking and satisfiers of their desires, there is high ratio of anxiety (Insomnia) and Suicidal deaths! While in poverty-stricken Islamic countries, there is not.
When we compare spreading of depression and homesickness and psychological clinics in Christian nations, we find rarity of this in Islamic nations.
In the Christian North where 20% from people of the earth consume 86% of the worldly benefits, three of the greatest branches of commerce: commerce of arms, commerce of drugs, and commerce of prostitution!!
All of these facts and the likes is a testimony of emptiness of the local churches which betray its Christianity and the rising of Islam by itself although the despaired case of most of their rulers and the brilliancy of Islamic solution above other solutions!
Below a picture of The Basilica of Saint'Antonio di Padova
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All in all, the lecture of the Pope Benedict XVI in Regensburg university, Germany on 12 September 2006, which explode Islamic Anger. It included actual, contemporary and historic facts which many of us overlook to. It also, shocked the Muslim feelings by its aggressions, lies, wrongs, and ignorance which any one cannot imagine it was announced by a Professor in philosophy the leader of the Worldwide Catholic Church when he talked about Islam which is a religion of 1.5 milliard of people.
The subject of the lecture is about "The relationship between reason and faith" in Christianity. The most stranger is that the Pope began his lecture by attacking on Islam and this take a quarter of this lecture!! About a hundred lines from 400 lines which is the number of the lines of the lecture!!
The most dangerous part of this lecture is his quotation from the Byzantine Emperor, Manuel II (1391-1425) did not as many of the commentators think of, but it is the comments of the Pope himself on the quotation! The Pope testified by these words in displaying the links between Islamic Jihad and The Crusades through what the Emperor said to one of the Persian Muslims: "Show me what was new Muhammad came by? You find evil and non-humanly matters like his command to spread Islam which he called to by sword". The Pope described the Emperor as an Encyclopedic and ignored the reply of the Persian Muslim to the Emperor, then he went saying and commenting saying: "The Emperor must knew the Surah no. 2, verse no. 256 which quoted that: "No compulsion on Religion" and it is one of the first Surahs in the history of Islam when Muhammad was still threatened and he needed power. But naturally also- the Emperor- knew the commands "Orders of Ignobles" about the Sacred War which is mentioned in the Quran.
In the Pope's saying about the relationship of reason and faith in Christianity and Islam, he said:" The concluded saying in discussing about dogmatic change by using violence, that is dealing according reason is a matter against the nature of God, but according Islamic commands, God is absolute and exalted, His will is not parallel to our reasoned characters.. Ibn Hazm went saying that God is not immanent with his specific word and there is nothing can make Him (God) explore "truth" to us, it is God's will. According to this, we must worship in idolatric blind manner. These are the prominent points of paralogism and calumnies presented about Islam in the lecture of the Pope which is not only brought anger among Muslims, but also need a scientific, subjective, calmly, and patiently dialogue with the Professor of philosophy, the Pope of Vatican.
If the American Newsweek magazine condemned some of what had been said about Islam in the Pope's lecture, and made the cover address of its 26-9-2006 volume, "Benedict XVI, what's the matter of him?!", then it described his way of talking about Islam by saying: "A clumsy way"! We defer in this description. The matter is not just "Absurdity", certainly! It is a situation has a long history of animosity to Islam. It is a new chapter and not to be the last chapter of animosity against Islam and calumny against its sacred places, slogans, and people and its civilization after a year from the Danish Caricaturist who hurt the Prophet of Islam peace be upon him. These words were said by whom? By the Pope of Vatican, it is not from a Danish Caricaturist and a journalist whom spread sis drawings on 30 September 2005.
The Pope Benedict spoke in his lecture, hurting God of Islam and the whole world when he announced that God's will (in Islamic beliefs) is exalted and absolute and is not related to reason or mind the matter which make faith –as in the Pope's saying- "idolatric and blind"!! When he wanted to speak about the Prophet of Islam peace be upon him, he chose –and his choose is a part of his mind- the words of Manuel II, the Byzantine Emperor, which is like a slur upon the Prophet of Islam peace be upon him and he said he came by only evils, bad, and inhumane like calling to his religion by sword!! From this point of view, the Pope compared between his Christianity and Islam by claiming, Reasoning of Christianity and non-reasoning of Islam and he accused Islam by violent establishment for aggression and terrorism and accused Muslims with both, and mixed between Islamic Jihad and Crusades by the Western Catholic Church.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The Pope by his (Original-Infidelity), he is an enemy for Secularism, which make the largest Catholic countries in Europe- France- that there is no one go to Sunday mass except 5% from its Catholic people.
It means, by the Pope point of view, that French Catholics are less in number than French Muslims!
For more than 25 years, before Papacy, he was the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, one of the most important offices of the Roman Curia, as a contemporary extension of Inquisition tribunals and institutions, which was professional, in Renaissance in Europe, in inquiring about tenets and practicing burning, suffocation, and sinking scholars, thinkers, philosophers, and against Muslims after fall of Granada and uprooting Islam from Andalusia 1492, when it practiced execution of all whom against. By impaling, for three centuries! The victims were millions at that time.
His choose for the name- his name before Papacy-Joseph Ratzinger of his Papal Name, Benedict XVI, as previously mentioned, is more related to his way of thinking (Original-Infidelity) against others. The Pope Benedict XIV (1740-1758) in the 18th century, he was against reasoning and doubt which by both, the European Lightening Movement, was raised.
Before that, in the 6th century, the Pope Benedict V (480-547) was the founder of Churches and Religious Order which were helped the continuity of Christian Civilization in Europe. He was the founder of the Religious tradition in the Western Civilization.
The name, Benedict, which he chose, has a Western Original Meaning and has a history!
About his hurts to Islam in his lecture in Regensburg city in Germany on 12-9-2006, it was not his first time hurting Islam. Benedict XVI has a history in fearing from Islam which became a way in the West, was known as Islamophobia. In a dialogue between him and Marcello Pera, the prominent Italian politician, whom published a book titled (Without roots, the West, Relativism, Islam and Christianity), Benedict XVI announced his fears:
i. Decreasing population of Christians of Europe because of secularism which announced Egoism and incoherence of familiar ties, only then the decrease of fertility and newborn to 1% will occur by saying:
"The newborn rate un Europe countries retreated. This affects the continuity of Popular Balance and made many European nations, especially, Germans, Italians and Spanish people retreated and may be it will not be present at the end of this century". In many of the best predictions, their people will become minorities within their nations.
ii. The European generations which evacuated their places will be substituted by Muslims immigrants, especially those Muslims of Africa and the Arab World which will probably make Europe a part of Islamic nations"!!
iii. "Retreat of Christianity in Europe"…because of Secularism. Europe becomes almost Christians in traditional meaning, by their history and families!! The matter which lead-in the Pope's view point- to "ill-desire of Europe morally and courageously to inflame war for freedom"!! The Pope Benedict XVI is the heir to his Church and his Christianity, which is the heart of the Christian World, before the end of this century, "part of Islamic nations", as previously Islam made the whole east –which was the core of Christianity-now the core of Islam. The Pope's fears from Islam reflected in as pictures which show the enmity of him to Islam and his calumny and hurts towards Islamic dogmas and sacred places, even before this lecture which explode anger of Muslims.
Islam reaches the top in exalting Allah, away from polymorphism, super session, unionism, incarnation and simile, Allah in the peak of Monotheism is what Allah says in the Qur'an: "Say : He is Allah, The One and Only, Allah, the Eternal, Absolute; he begetteth not, nor is He begotten; and there is none like unto Him". Everything you can reach to by your imagination, Allah is not like it. This is Islam as the word of Monotheism describes, and expresses, "There is no God, but Allah".
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monotheism –in the eye sight of the Pope- present in Judaism which make God (Allah) special for sons of Israel, and for other nations have their Gods! Present in Christianity which calls for "Trinity", and worship Jesus as God and says about Jesus, that he is the A and Z, the beginning and the end, who able to do everything, the creature of everything, and by him everything was and without him nothing was.
About Islam, which says, Allah is The One and Only and exalts Allah away from likeness, equality, partners, similarity, friendship, father, and son. In the eye sight of the Pope, Islam is not a Monotheistic religion!!
If the Cardinal, Joseph Ratzinger took Papal Name, which denote his preservative Western Christian original directions, his enmity to Islam and his open call to this enmity against Islam and practicing it in attacking and hurting Islam. All this has a history, not only but a long history filled with black Cultural hating to Islam and Muslims.
In his Catholic heritage, the famous Catholic philosopher and the prominent priest in the middle European Ages, Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274), said about the Prophet of Islam peace be upon him:" Muhammad attract nations through his promises to enjoy desires and he displaced evidences in the Pentateuch and the Bible through legends and superstitions, which he learned his companions and no one believe in his message except the vagabonds whom resided desert".
In the European Catholic technical and literary heritage-the Pope's of Vatican heritage- Dante presented (1295-1321) the Divine Comedy, when he put the Prophet of Islam peace be upon him and Ali Ibn Abi-Taleb in the ninth ditch which presented with eighth circle of the Hell because both were of the people of hypocrisy whom their bodies were torn in the Hell of the Divine Comedy"!
In the heritage of the Pope, whom describe Islam as a religion of non-monotheistic –Song of Roland- an epic was written nearly 1300. In it, it was mentioned that Muslim worship the Trio: Apollin, Tervagant, and Muhammad.
With the testimonies of the Western scholars whom compare Islam to, the bad, offensive, mal-pictures which the Western Christianity has made to Islam. The mal-image of the Western Christian which permit to give mal-picture about Islam and enhance public to Crusades which were raised up by the Western Church to bring back The Orient from Islamic Liberation, The witness upon this Truth is the French orientalist, Maxim Rodinson 91915-2004) whom said:" the latin writers between 1000-1140 burden with satisfying the need of the public. They directed their efforts towards the life of Muhammad without any accuracy to "Victorious Ignorable Image" as the words of R. Wasaorthen ""Muhammad in their traditions is a sorcerer who demolish Church in Africa and the East by magic and betraying. His success include freedom of sexual relations and also, Muhammad in their old epic poetry is the Great Idol and most poets considered him the Grand god of Saracens –Bidouins- and his statues, according their sayings, were made from nutrients and in big sizes!
By the testimony of the Italian orientalist, Francisco Gabrielli, who said:" The middle European Ages looked to Islam and its spread as a Devil Crack in the bosom of the Christian Church and a pessimistic division which a barbaric people held it to.
With the testimony of the German orientalist, Hubert von Herkomer, in his study "Islam in the middles ages literature", he said:" Europeans claimed that the Prophet of Islam was a Catholic cardinal, whom was ignored by the Church from the election of Papacy, then he established a secular sect in the east as a revenge from the Church. The Christian Europe considered –in renaissance- Muhammad is the most heretic from Christianity who carry the burden of half of human beings whom leave Christianity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With the testimony of the German orientalist, Dr. Sigrid Hunke, who said : " It was stable in minds of most of Europeans, the stupid disdain to Arabs, whom were described by them, out of ignorance and enmity as shepherds of goat and sheep clowns, whom wear slimsy garments, whom worship devils, necromancers, sorcerers, and whom practicing black magic professionally and Satan guarded with his sons, and Muhammad is sitting upon Satan's Golden Throne control Arabs and sacrifices of all human beings bowed to feet of Muhammad which were slaughtered by his companions to became closer to him. Arabs are the dissolute disbelievers, whom are not believe in Jesus or Allah because Arabs still not worship him yet. They are but only despicable scoundrels, enemies of Allah and enemies of Jesus and revenants of the Jesus tomb"!
According to the description of J.Toynbee (1889-1975), who said :" Arabs are not civilians, but strange creatures away from the Hellenistic (Greek) world, or those whom are intrusive upon Greek Hellenic Civilization. Those aboriginal Mohamedans, imitating barbaric forged ignorant of Syriac religion, which is a strange religion for them. Because of their aboriginality and their deficiency, they will not seek to embrace Christianity.
" The European Church picturesque the Prophet of Islam as a grand sorcerer and picturesque "Granada" in Andalusia as home of worshippers of Satan, those who intercede with dead. The dead, whom will presented to Muhammad, the Great Idol whom guarded with devils, a human sacrifice."!!
" The Islamic nations are a world of superstitions and legends, worshippers of Satan and the sorcerers whom intercede with Satan, the nations of human sacrifices to the Great Golden Idol, vigil up on his safety, a group of devils, named Muhammad."!!
The Church's poet, Priest Conrad (1300)-in Regensburg- the Song of Roland, which described Muslims as the people whom satisfied not their thirstiness to blood shed and the Heavenly God cursed them, they are disbelievers, dogs, pigs, and dissolute and worshippers of idols which hadn't power. They did not deserve, but to kill, and throw their bodies away. They will be in Hell without doubts."!!
In this public priest epic, Conrad spoke to Muslim people, saying : " Mekhmet –Muhammad- sent to separate your head from your body and to throw it to prey. To know that Caesar ordered that who will not obey the Church to baptize him, nothing was for him, but only death, hanged, beaten or burnt. All were the people of Satan, ignoble, whom lose this life and the Hereafter and the anger of Allah fell on them to tear their spirits and bodies and they will be in the Hell for ever."!!
For the Golden Pope, Urban II (1088-1099), when he was ignite the fire of Crusades against Islam and Muslims. He was speak to cavalry of European feudal enhancing them to sacred war against Muslims by saying :" What a shame covered us if these kind of disbelievers, whom but only deserved all ignoble, whom fell in abyss of dishonor, made themselves Satan's worshippers, destined victory over the "Chosen Allah's Nation"!!
This is the picture of Islam and his Prophet peace be upon him and the picture of Muslims in the heritage of Catholic Europe, which was competed with by Protestantic Europe, which spoke for it, Martin Luther (1482-1546) about the Holy Qur'an by saying: "It was a horrible, damned, and cursed book, filled with lies, superstitions and horrible things. It must be the source of annoyance to Muhammad and hurting Muslims, as the aim at translating Qur'an and identification of Christians about it. It must be for all priests to speak in front of public about horrible of Muhammad to increase enmity of Christians; also, to fix their faiths with Christianity, to double their courage in the War against Turkish Muslims and to sacrifice their money and themselves in these wars."!!
The picture of the Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him-the Gift, Light and the Glad-tider for the Worlds-in the words of the great head in Protestantism: "A picture of a server of callets and the hunter of fancy women."!!!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
If someone astonished of the "Black ill-Imagination" of the European Church, Popes, priests, poets and its people of its strange and astonished level of transgression over Islam and Muslims. This astonish increase when you see this heritage of the black hatred is still present, active, without criticism or revision, verily, directed the Pope of the Vatican –the Professor of Philosophy-Benedict XVI in the 21st century!!
Not only the matter stopped at this, in the eye sight of the Pope, his preservative, original western meaning, but the more is that we are in front of a heritage of hatred and transgression upon Islam, its dogmas and its sacred matters. This great institute (Vatican) of hatred which the Pope headed enhanced Europe to Crusades- the first worldwide war on Islam for two centuries (489-690/1096-1291).
Not only this great institute (Vatican) highly satisfied with it and participated in preaching Christianity in Modern European battles to colonize the Islamic world for five long centuries from conquering Granada and Andalusia 1492 up to the very moment!!
The Vatican which sent Christopher Columbus(1451-1506) to collect Gold after extermination of residents of North and South America to initiate a new Crusade against Islamic world to regain Orshaleem. On that day, Columbus wrote to the Pope Alexander VI (1492-1503) saying: "These missions to America to bring gold to spend it on regaining Sacred Land. When I went there to that land, I wrote to the King Ferdinand (1479-1516) and the Queen Isabella (1474-1504) that: "From that day on, I will needed 50,000 soldiers and 5000 cavalry men to conquer the Sacred Land".
Also, the Vatican sent Vasco Da Gama (1469-1524) circling around Islamic world to initiate batting the core of Islamic world 1497.
The Vatican also sent Magellan(1480-1521) to fight Muslims in Philippine and preaching. Philippine is a Muslim country, its Capital named "Aman Allah". The archbishop of the French Church announced at the presence of the King Chales X (1824-1830). When Algeria was colonized on 1830, he praised Allah that Christianity gained victory over Islam a great victory and still do. Its priests and Cardinals announced in celebrating (1934)a hundred year colonizing Algeria. "The time of the Crescent in Algeria is disappeared and time of the Cross begin and will be continue for ever and we must make Algeria the cradle of a Christian nation enlightened by the light of a civilization originated from revelation of the Bible and the core of these celebrations was the death of Islam on this Land"!!
The French Church which General kléber (1753-1800), after the French Campaign in Egypt ordered "Jacob Hanna"(1745-1801) to do whatever with Muslims till the Christians did blaspheme Muslims and beat them appearing their animosity and announced the end of Islam and the days of Monotheistics.
This Church institute's Cardinals in our contemporary days, announce the war to make people frightened from Islam. Not only the Pope Benedict XVI.
Cardinal Paul Pobar, the second man in Vatican after john Paul II, who was responsible for the cultural Papal Council said: " The challenge which Islam causes is for it is not only a religion, but also culture, society, and a living style, while Christians in Europe incline to marginalize the Church. Islam is a challenge for Europe and the West in general. It does not need to be a professional to notice the wide range between the West and the Islamic world. In the culture of Christian nations, there is a gradual retraction of population number while the opposite is in the Islamic nations. When Jesus shall come, Christians will ask with anxiously wheat tomorrow bring for them and whether their death is programmed by someone."
Cardinal Monsieur Josebi Bernardini said in the presence of the Pope John Paul II:" the Islamic world began to spread through dollars of Petrol. Islam builds mosques and cultural centers for immigrant Muslims in Christian nations and also in Rome, the Capital of Christianity, then, why we did not see in this a program for widening and a new opening?"
We are not in front of a personal animosity of a new Pope presented Catholicism in its origin or a heritage of inquisition or Old Crusades from Islam and Muslims, but in the presence of a leader of this Roman Church, the greatest western Christian Church, filled with animosity against Islam. Not only this, but spread fears from it, which appeared as a danger, Europe will be threatened to be a part of Islam in this new century.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Concerning the post of the human mind in Islamic belief and thought, the great man of the Vatican, the Pope, who was studied philosophy and teach it, ignore that Allah-The All-Mighty- in Islam, from His mightiest names, The All-Wise and He is The All-Mighty, The All-Wise and The Omniscient, The All-Wise…and He reveals the book and wisdom, and He –the All-Mighty, sent His messenger Muhammad peace be upon him to teach people the book and wisdom .. even women(wives of the Prophet Muhammad(PBUH))denoted that the Holy Quran was recited in their houses
"Of the Signs of God and His Wisdom", v34 Surah Ahzab
"And he to whom wisdom is granted receiveth indeed a benefit overflowing", v269 Surah:Al-Baqara
"Glory to thee: of knowledge We have none, save what it is thou who art perfect in knowledge and wisdom", v32 Surah: Al-Baqara
"Thou are the exalted in power, the wise", v113 Surah:Al-Ma'eda
"Then know that God is exalted in power, wise", v209 Surah:Al-Baqara
" It is He Who has sent amongst the Unlettered an apostle from among themselves, to rehearse to them His Signs, to sanctify them, and to instruct them, and to instruct them in Scripture and Wisdom, although they had been, before in manifest error"; v2 Surah :Al-Gom'aa
"God hath sent down to thee the book and wisdom", v113 Surah:Al-Nisaa'
"And recite what is rehearsed to you in your homes, of the Signs of God and His Wisdom", v34 Surah: Al-Ahzab
The Holy Quran describes Allah with wisdom and reasoning in a hundred verses of The Holy Quran, 49 verses talk about the mind and reasoning. In the Holy Quran about 132 verses talk about Heart, and it is an instrument of reasoning and about jurisprudence meaning conscious of mind in 20 verses. About wisdom in 19 verses and about thinking in18 verses. About "the core" meaning mind and the human heart in 16 verses.. About accounting as meaning of mind in 7 verses. About reflection in 4 verses. About prohibition as a meaning of thinking in two verses.
It means, the Holy Quran is considered the miracle of mind enhancing mind to reasoning. The materialistics do not excite mind, but paralyze it. In the Holy Quran there are nearly 300 verses talk about mind and reasoning in addition to 100 verses, its texts describe Allah by The All-Wise as one of the mightiest names.
Verily, the Holy Quran considers ignorance of reasoning and wisdom, the way to Hell (Allah's forbid)
They will further say: Had we but listened or used our intelligence, We should not (now) be among the Companions of the Blazing Fire!10,11 verses of Surah:Al-Mulk
Doesn't not he (the Pope) listen to what the Prophet Muhammad said: "The mind has a religious origin" and said: "Learn the Holy Quran, it is the mind understanding and the light of wisdom and the sources of science and the most newly book came from Allah (Darami related).
Doesn't not he (the Pope) read what Ibn Rushd(520-595/ 1126-1198) whom his wisdom awaken Europe from theological superstitions of the Church and how Ibn Rushd made the top ranking of wisdom and reasoning an evidence of the presence of Allah? How Ibn Rushd announced that wisdom is the sister in milk to Islamic Creed?
Doesn't he (the Pope) listen to Isolationists and the Reasoning direction in the Islamic thoughts and Islamic philosophy which proceed others of non-Muslims' sayings about Allah. He must not and not suitable for Him because He has the absolute wisdom in His will and deeds to do the good and the best. Isolationists override this and make it a must in Allah!! They depend for that on their understanding of the Holy Quran when Allah says :"(To God) he hath inscribed from himself the rule of mercy", v12 Surah: Al-An'aam
Doesn't he (the Pope) read what the Islamic arguing scholar Abu Hamed Al-Ghazali (450-505/ 1058-1111), wrote? He was an Islamic professor for many Christian Philosophers and priests about the biological relation between mind and the Islamic Creed in the Holy Quran in Islam and how mind is like the eye sight and the Creed is like the sun and its light. He said they are not (mind and Creed) mindful when separate one of both from the other and he said: "There is no objection between the transformed creed and the reasoning of truths. The mind is like the correct eye sight away from wrong and the Holy Quran is the light of the sun and who sacked one from the other, he is a stupid. The one who work without mind, only using the Quran is like the one who exposed to the sun light closing his eyes. There is no difference between him and the blind. Only then mind and Creed are a light on a light. How then wisdom comes by imitating and ignore research and look around?
Doesn't he know the background for the Creed is the saying of the master of human beings, the Prophet Muhammad PBUH and the evidence is the proof to know the truthfulness of the Prophet PBUH ? Mind is preferred know by the name of "light". Someone will say the "truth" is preferred to know by the name of "light". When you sense the light of wisdom, practically man will see after seeing by his eye on the presence of light. The great wisdom is Allah's sayings. The verses of the Holy Quran in mind is like sunlight for the eye sight. With sunlight we can see thing. It is more likely to give the name "light" to the Holy Quran mindedly like giving the name Sunlight to "the light" of the sun. For example the likeness of the Holy Quran is "the sun light" and the example of mind is the eye sight and by this we can understand Allah's saying:" Believe, therefore, in God and His Apostle, and in the Light which We have sent down", v8 Surah:Taghabun. When something reasonably impossible, only then interpretation is enough to what we had been obtained by listening. It is not reasonable to observe listening of something not mindful or mindedly opposite. Allah's revelation and Creed (legislation) has not anything unreasonable. For all of this, mind is the top ranking of happiness".
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Imam Al-Ghazali said too in the interpretation of the verse :" We have honored the sons of Adam"Surah: Israa' v70. The most honorable thing that Allah gives is that very "Mind" which Allah distinguishes man from animal and gathers him with Angels and qualifies "mind" to know his creator and His creatures and know His attributes by what He –The All-Mighty- gives wisdom to man".
Doesn't he know, (the Pope), that Islam makes doubts in Systematic uncertainty as a science and Islam makes it a must to know because it is the way to certainty even Al-Jahidh, (163-255/780-869) said: " You must know positions of "doubts" and know cases of doubt from cases of certainty. Learn to "doubt' from cases of doubts is a must. If not but only you must make a stop and prove, this is what we need. No certainty of something but only is preceded by a doubt. No transition from a belief of something to another except through a doubt in between. Do not go to what you see with your eye but what you see with your "mind". Two distinguished matters must be taken into consideration: matters apparent to senses and matters hidden in "mind". Only "mind" can distinguish between,
Mawardi,(364-450/974-1058) said: "The causes which lead to know the Legitimate assets and practice it are two:
1-Sense "mind" because arguments of reason are basic to know Legitimate assets.
2-Knowledge of Arabic language, it is significant especially in hearing arguments".
The saying of Al-Qarafi, Ahmed Ibn Idris(684/1285):" … and the Rule information: Legislation is not opposite to "mind". Really, the all legislation must be confined in matters that "mind" consider them permissible either present or absent. Then legislation weighting either presence or absence or equal in between. This is permissibility".
Judge Abd Al-Gabbar Ibn Ahmed Al-Hamadani,(415/1024) said:" Evidences at first distinguish by "mind". Only by it you can distinguish between good and bad. With "mind", only you know evidence, also for the Sunnah and Consensus. May be someone will astonish about that arrangement of sources of legislation and think that these are: The Book, Sunnah, Consensus and that are only. Or he may think that "mind" if it denotes matters but it is postponed. It is not. Because Allah speaks to people's mind. With "mind"you know The Book, Sunnah and Consensus. We say the Book awakes minds to indicate evidences. With mind we distinguish rules of deeds and rules of doers. Only with it we know which must be left from that which we must take, that something preferred and the other disrepute. For this non-minded are not responsible for their deeds. With mind we know Allah is the One and the Only, the Wise, the Book is an evidence, the Messenger that He sent with miracles to know him from the liars. The Prophet's sayings are fixed facts. The Prophet (PBUH) said: "My Ummah will not gather upon wrong and you must gather in one group". By this Consensus is a source of legislation. When the Pope of the Vatican made a subject on "relation between belief (Faith) and mind", then how he ignores Islamic philosophers? Abu Hashim Al-Gaba'ie, (247-321/861-933) is one of them said:" The first work upon human being is to Doubt"! Abu Ali Al-Gaba'ie,(235-304/849-916), said: "the first work upon man is to Look"! This is originated from the Quranic base for "Systematic uncertainty": " Show me how thou givest life to the dead. he said: dost thou not then believe? he said: yea! but to satisfy my own understanding", Surah Al-Baqara,v260. Even Imam Ibn Taimia, Imam of Salafi and one of great famous scholars in Islam, (661-728/1263-1328), whom titled his book "Preventing conflict between Explicit reasoning and True transmissible". We find him announced: " That hanafites and most of Shafi'ites, maliketes and Hanbalites said: "Mind distinguishes good from bad and this is saying of Karramites and Isolationists and most of Muslim ranges". It means the most Islamic streams of thinking, philosophers and scholars make "mind" a reference to distinguish Good from Bad.
The Pope of the Vatican and the professor of Philosophy ignored the Islamic Old philosophical heritage. Then why he ignores the Modern Islamic philosophical heritage in Islamic reasoning which the scholar, Gamal Eddin Al-Afghani, (1254-1314/1838-1897), who said: "islamic religion is the soul religion to censurethe believers without evidence, reprimand followers of guesses and reproach the bumpy whom is blind and with bad biography.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Religion of Islam enhances Muslims to grasp evidences of basic principles of Islam when Islam speaks to mind. When Islam makes a judge, it will be related to "mind". Texts of Islam tell that happiness is the result of "mind" and the "insight". Misery and misguidance are the extension of negligence of mind and the extinction of light of "insight". Rarely, in a presence of religions, no religion equal to Islam in this advantage. Mind is fro where faith brightened. Who exchange Islam with another religion, his faith will fade. Non-Muslims acknowledge this advantage to Islam. Comparing between mind reaching to the Core of something, it will be known by its effect and it is related to something else impossible. The first, "mind" acknowledges it but in the other, "mind" can not recognize it. Then how can "mind" believe in its presence?!
Man begins like any creature that Allah creates, but the difference is his power to think. Allah SWT makes power of "mind" is his tool to be good and to prosper. Wisdom and its tool, "mind" is the Law Maker and the maker of clearance to different ways and establish systems and put limits of manners, good and bad. All in all, "mind" is the frame of perfection of thought and manners. It is an honourable tool.
Man is the greatest Secret of this Universe. With his mind, he can make clearance to many secrets of nature. With "science", he can reach by "mind" to free images. Free images become believable and all what was impossible will become possible and real.
The first pillar Islam is built on is to refine mind with Monotheism and make it pure of any illusions. The happiness of nations is with clearance of "mind" from superstitions and rusty illusions. When a fake doctrine pollutes "mind", like heavy veil, a barrier between it and the reality will prevent "mind" from discovering reality. A superstition may stopped "mind" from thinking and enhance thoughts replacing it. This will make "Mind" accept every illusion and believe every thought and at the very moment mind will be farther from perfection. Illusions make veil between "mind" and understanding. Superstitions also make souls fear and frightened.
Islam opens doors of honor in front of souls and decides the advantages based on mind and soul perfection only. Differentials of people are by "mind", virtue and Ummah's doctrines. It is the first code inspired in their souls and be built on correct evidences and be protected against thoughts and makes them ranked high away from imitating their fathers.
When a believer think of something without proof, he will not has faith in this thing and he will not believe in. Only then he will called a 'follower" of a thought. Those whom satisfied with imitation, their "minds" will be stopped at what they recognize. They will not be able to think more or to look. When they continue, they will become stupid gradually because their "minds" become unable to distinguish between good and bad. They only then be surrounded by misery and have no lick and went to bad fate. This is "Islam".
Doesn't the Pope of the Vatican and the professor of philosophy read anything of what the Oriental Philosopher, Gamal Eddin Al-Afghani said about "Uniqueness" of Islam over other religions, concerning "Reasoning" and the testimonies of its opponents?!
Is it right for the like (of the Pope) controversy about the position of Islam from "Reasoning" and "mind" ignoring these famous articles-even in foreign language- about "Islamic Reasoning"?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doesn't he, the Pope, hear of the Imam Professor Muhammad Abdu (1266-1323/1848-1905) who many of theses were put around his thoughts in many universities who many of Western theologians who were sent and made dialogues with Western thinkers and philosophers from Leo Tolstoy (1828-1910) to Spencer (1820-1903), Hanutu (1853-1944) …,and others … and he who wrote the unique Islamic Insight in comparing between and Ill-reasoning of the Pope's mind of the Vatican!!
Didn't the Pope Benedict XVI hear what Muhammad Abdu wrote about: that human being has mind. His power is from that very "mind". When the power of man's mind is applied in this world, the all universe will be perfect. "Mind" is for power. "Mind" is the power of all powers and the universe is an open Book which "mind" looks in and reads what within. Everything that "mind" read in this book is a guide to Allah and a way to reach to Him (The All—Mighty). The "mind" is the CORE of humanity of man and really is the best of human powers. "Mind" and "Religion" both are co-working brothers (in Islam). For the first time in a Holy Book which had been recited by a Prophet, who was sent openly and without a translation and it is confirmed by all Muslims except who has not confident "mind" and "religion". Of the religious matter are those which couldn't be believed in without "mind" as the acknowledge of presence of Allah and His ability to send messengers and His Science to inspire them(messengers) and His will to send His messages to them and what follow this and what the meanings it was depended on as to believe in this message. Their consensus when something be above understanding, it is not and will not be impossible with "mind". The first pillar Islam is based on is to "Look with mind". With looking, it is the way to correct belief. It is the mind's looking and who judge to "mind" then nothing can be above "mind" and Islam will not be above "mind". With this basic rule, a Muslim of Sunni said: The one who exert his effort to reach to the TRUTH, then he couldn't reach to, he will die safely. Then how much wide is this widening without criticism? The all of Muslims except few -not depend on this few- is when something is not agreed with "mind"-from sayings of Muslim scholars- we must take what mind says with submission to their sayings with complete acknowledge of disability to understand this sayings and return to Allah's Science or translate scholars' sayings with preserving the language of which it be written with till agree with what it be confirmed with "mind".
------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no certainty with embarrass to look. Certainty is to look to universes, its lengths and widths to reach to what you aim at without limitation. Muhammad Abdu talks about-in his book "Thought, mind and science"-without limitation. When we stop at only understanding phrases, it is unlike and stands not with what our predecessors wrote from "Jewels" of "thoughts". The Holy Quran calls peoples to look with their minds because it is a (Quran) miracle exposed to "mind" and only "mind" can judge upon, and to "mind" only is the absolute looking to it and to expose what is to be hidden. Islam is to depend but only to "mind's proof" and human thinking which is parallel to its innate nature. "Mind" is not to astonish with ABNORMAL, isn't to envelope eyes within ABNORMAL LEVELS, and is not to dumb with a "Heavenly Stroke" and isn't to disturb your thinking by a "Godly Shout". Man will not to believe except of what he reasoned and knew with himself to be convinced with. He who grow up with submitting to things without thinking and work-even if it is good work-but without jurisprudence, he isn't a BELIEVER. Because man is not like an animal in doing good but man must be ranking high with his "mind" and man must honor himself with SCIENCE and know Allah and do good because he know it is the beneficial goodness which satisfies Allah, and leave evil because he understand its dad consequence upon his life and religion. Man must know what to believe because the wise man doesn't imitate the like of him. So, man mustn't imitate the ignorant, primarily, who is low than you!
When no relation between causes and deeds, he who find this in his BOOK of religion of his, to know that only Faith is the tool to believer to say to a mountain "to move" from its very place and mountain does!! So, with only sincere praying, planets and all universes can be upside down… This is not Islam!
Islam, in its BOOK: "And say: work (righteousness): soon will Allah observe your work" Surah: Repentance: v:105.
"Against the make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war" Surah: Anfal:v:60
"Such was) the practice (approved) of God among those who lived aforetime: no change wilt thou find in the practice (approved) of God." Surah: Ahzab: v: 62, and the like. It is not impossible for a Muslim to rank high above causes and deeds except if he goes to disbelieve before he went to it by his mind!
For nations and people are Allah's practices which are called rituals and laws and a system for human societies and what happens to is within one system not to be changed or exchanged. Anyone who seeks happiness in the society must look at the principals of this system to weigh his deeds according to and to build his C.V. of what to do and not to do according to. If he neglects to look at this system, misery await him even if he is a good man related to good people with his deeds.
In spite of man's search, look, and decision, he only give us these very Allah' laws and rituals. He goes with the nature of his religion. The nature of the religion is not against him." Many were the ways of life that have passed away before you: travel though the earth, and see what was the end of those who rejected truth" Surah:Al Imran:v:137
The guidance of Allah to these laws is a science must be written to present a guide in a perfect manner. The all Ummah must has a group to explain Allah's laws to people as they did in all branches of sciences and arts which the Holy Qur'an guides us to its outlines and the scholars explain it according to its guidance as Monotheism, Assets, and jurisprudence. Science of Allah's laws is the most beneficial and important science. The Holy Qur'an guides us to it from nations' conditions by walking to see everything clear and its reality. With this principal the Holy Qur'an, Sunnah, and deeds of the Prophet peace be upon him are established on, made it easy with "mind" and move all of the obstacles in front to widen the scene without limitation.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Imam Muhammad Abdu mentioned the excellence of Islamic Reasoning and described it by "Wise Belief" which collects between "mind" and "inspiration". Between laws of the universe which is Allah's open book and the verses revealed and rituals: the Allah's written book. It is innocent from theological superstitions as the like its innocence of "Egoism" of mind, innocence of abstracted reasoning from translated matters (which translated by us from scholars who wrote it in the era of the Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him- as the case in Greek era and innocence of man-made materialistic Reasoning which came in European Renaissance-a revelation upon theological reasoning. For this, Imam Muhammad Abdu adjusts this "Islamic Reasoning Belief" when he said: The human mind is not with itself could reach with its owner to happiness of this life except few that they were not recognized. If they had great significance, their era appointed to them by their generation: May be some of the deeds which could not be recognized its good and from the forbidden which we couldn't recognize its badness. These matters are not good except their orders and are not bad except their prohibition.
The mind evidence is not to push an argument and not to grab tranquility. Maybe the one who follows man-made laws claims that he is in a higher rank than the one who put it. He will go with people by his desires and only then these laws will loose its prohibition and aims and will be ruined. If we evaluate that human mind, we find that its perfection is to reach to the knowledge of conditions of creatures which are within conscious of mind. But to reach to the CORE of the TRUTH, is something that human mind couldn't reach to. The conditions of the Hereafter will not be reach to by a human mind alone, but the human mind needs a helper to reach to ways of happiness in this life and the Hereafter. "Mind" is from where certainly gushed (like water) in believing in Allah and His Science, Ability and believing in message. Translation is from where the Unseen is gushed as the case in the Hereafter and worshipping…
We must believe in that Islam is the religion of monotheism and not a religion of separating laws, mind is its helper and translation (of Prophets and scholars sayings) is the strongest pillar. On this very way, is the Islamic Reasoning (Islamic Wisdom) which signify "mind" by its ranking high which is between minding of the seen and believing in Translation which depicting the world of the Unseen, which means Reasoning between Science and Unseen. On this way, Sheikh Hassan Al-Banna, (1324-1368/1906-1949), Islam is not confined on thoughts and is not capturing in minds, but to free the mind and enhance thinking in the Universe and weigh science and scientists and welcomes good and beneficial of everything. "Wisdom" is which a believer looks for and where he will find it, he must take it". Both of ritual and mindful look may inter within the circle of the (OTHER) but they will not defer in the beliefs. A scientific fact will not be against a constant ritual. The interpreted thoughts must be agreed to the constant one by interpretation. When both thoughts are interpretation, only then the ritual one is the prime to be followed until the mindful thinking will be proved or will be ruined. The human mind hesitated between:
1- The superstition phase and simplicity and absolute submission to the unseen.
2- The stagnant materialistic phase and the disguise to the ignorant unseen.
Both types of thinking is a clear wrong and obscene thoroughgoing and ignorance of what surrounds human mind. Islam comes to judge this suite when gathers between believing in the unseen and benefits from thinking. The human society will not be mended but only by spiritual belief which enhances the observance of Allah in souls in the same time which it must be upon humanity to their minds to learn, know, invent, discover and forced a matter and to benefit from goods and advantages in this world. To this form of thinking we- Muslims- gather between two thinking: the unseen and scientific one which we call people to.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
As we see in the previous serial of the same titled notes, Islam is the more a religion, civilization, history and distinctive faithful rationality than any of rationalities had other rituals and civilizations identified. Man is a rational style, the power for presenting "mind". "Mind" is the human CORE and for human powers. In fact, it is the mainstay and the power of human power. "Mind" and "Religion" both for the first time in the Holy Quran and the heavenly historic rituals are gathered. Allah in the Holy Quran speaks to "mind", "thinking" and "science". "Mind" is the judge. A Muslim (he/she) can not be a real one except when he/she to think about religion and know it with "mind" and to convince about it. "Mind" is the brightness of faithful believing. The human happiness is a result from "mind" and "consciousness". Happiness of nations will not be perfect except with pure minds from superstitions and the rust of illusions. Rationality and laws is the judge in this universe and society. The first duty upon man is "To Look" and the "Systematic Uncertainty" is the way to "Certainty". "Mind is the WILL of certainty in believing in Allah and believing his messages. The translation from Muslim scholars is the gushing will from the Unseen… So, "mind" the most supportive tool to Islam. Translation is the most of pillars of Islam.
Then, the Pope of the Vatican, from what did he come by this "innovative idea"-that Prof. of philosophy, the greatest man in Vatican- which he claimed that his Christian rationally is above this in Islam?
Didn't he read the comparison between the two religions (Islam and Christianity) by Imam Muhammad Abdu in this matter? How it is from the basics of Christianity- that no one defer in it even though he /she is a catholic, an orthodox or a protestant- that "Faith" is a gift that "mind" has nothing to do in it, and from beliefs are some that "mind" can't accept (i.e. what is against mindful logic)? In spite of this, things must be believed in. Saint Anselm, (1033-1109) said: You must believe first in what is exposed upon your heart without thinking. The belief is not in need to mindful looking and "Mindful Looking" is the base of correct faith. Then, where is the rational Christianity from the speech of Saint Anselm? However it is, it is not above rationality in Islam by all the examples we presented in other notes of this serial.
Islam and its Philosophers and thinkers decided that "mind" is the way to know Allah, the Almighty. Because with mind man can think of creation and becomes conscious that Allah must be there, who described with all beautiful traits of perfection and mighty and this is the first duty upon man in Islam. To look in heavenly Books, prophecies, and messages before believe!!Allah said in the Holy Quran:
"Say: behold all that is in the heavens and on earth"
Surah "Yunus": vs.101
"Say: Travel through the earth and see how God did originate creation"
Surah "Spider": vs.20
When it is permitted to the Pope to ignore the Islamic ancient and modern heritage in Islamic mind, the distinctive, superior, and the unique -and this is not permitted to him to ignore of course! Then, how he ignores and he is the Prof. of Philosophy, what Alfred Geom said about the uniqueness of Islamic Philosophy which was founded on Islam: The power of Isolationists which the theology and Islamic Philosophy were founded on before the era of translation from Greeks which returned back their efforts to establish Islamic Theology upon constant fixed bases of philosophy, insisting on logical basics and harmony between it and philosophy which as a science must be teach upon religious basics.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Where is rationality O', the Pope of Vatican? In a religion violates the laws of causes and he decides –in his book- that only faith is enough to say to a mountain to move from its place then it be! Or only prayer is enough to give ability to change the orbits of planets and change the elemental composition of the Universe and bring it upside down?!
Verily, where is even the shadow of a religion, its people-still the 2nd century- believe in "mumbles" in Latin words can exchange wine and bread into flesh and blood of their Lord! The they have it to eat and then to where everyone know (to excrete)!!
Where is rationality that, the Pope of the Vatican talking about and be proud of, you, the Pope. Ah, Augustine, (354-430) was who to say: "Is it to believe in it as it is impossible or unmindful!!" Also, Waheeb Allah Ata, the priest says: "Incarnation is contradicted to mind, logic, sense, material, and philosophical expressions. But we didn't believe, it is possible or reasonable!!" Where is rationality then for these people book which call to "Believe as you are blind!"…"Close your eyes and follow me!!" If you, the Pope of the Vatican didn't read what the Holy Quran and the Prophetic traditions and Islamic philosophy and Islamic thinking about the post of "mind" in Islam … then is it suitable for the like of You (the Pope) to ignore what the Western scholars wrote about Islamic Rationality and its role in spreading of Islam?! What they wrote about irrationality of your Romano-Christianity which is condemned by the Hellenic Culture and filling secrets and puzzles and the role of your irrationality in the defeat of your Christianity in front of Islamic Rationality?! Have you, the Pope of the Vatican, ignore what the famous Western scholars wrote, gathering between Islamic and Christian jurisprudence and from them, Sir Tomas Arnold, (1864-1930), the Giant in English culture, who wrote in his book "Call to Islam" the witnesses of scholars, philosophers, theologians, and Orientalists about Rationality of Islam …
How is Christianity filled with secrets and puzzles which are impossible to understand even its people can't.(specialists).
Sir Tomas Arnold said: "No one can explain the form of Islamic Rationality and what is gained of benefit by this form in spreading this call (to Islam), an interested explanation more than what the Professor Edouard Montet, (1856-1927) announce: "Islam in its core is a rational religion by all the meaning of this word from both directions of deriving. It is a way of assessing religious believes on the bases of principals of Rationalism and history. The identification of rational form derived from mind and logic is applied fully on Islam, the religion of Muhammad has all singes which means that a group of beliefs are stand upon logic and mind"…The belief in Allah and the Last Day-in Islam- are settled in the believer's soul on a fixed base derived from "mind" and "logic" and it concludes all the laws revealed in the Quran. The simplicity of these laws and clarity of it is the prominent and the most powerful point in this religion (Islam) and its spreading. The Quran is preserved without change or exchange as a basic point of the beginning of Islamic laws. The Quran, with a loud voice declares the Qneness of Allah in great and honorable purity without exchange. It is difficult to see, other than in Islam, these advantages. In this only, many of reasons are behind the success of efforts of callers to Islam. It was expected to a limited belief, philosophical complications, and it is also, easy to handle by a normal person. It is really, has a fantastic power to win people conscioness.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Another testimony than of the Fresh scholar-Montet-the expert in Thr Holy Quran , Islam, and Catholicism, Sir Tomas Arnold mentioned the testimony of the Italian Theologist, Father Marachi, (1612-1700), who published the Holy Quran with Italian translation and also contributed in translating both the Old and New testaments by his saying: If man compares between the simple natural superiority over the ability of human intelligence or which is at the least if not impossible (the Christian doctrine) and Islamic doctrine, man will walk away leaving the Christian doctrine to the Islamic doctrine with full acceptability".
Other than these testimonies (Montet and Father Marachi), on superiority of Islam and its Rationalism, verily, its uniqueness in Islam (Rationalism)especially when compared with Christianity, Sir Tomas Arnold mentioned other Western testimonies, that Rationalism is the top secret for the spreading of Islam which in this era was witnessed, he is Caetani, (1869-1926), the expert on Islamic doctrine, an Italian Price and Orientalist (Caetani-Lion), and the owner of the specific excellences on Achievement of the Islamic Heritage who said: "The propagation of Islam among Christians of Oriental Churches is for feeling of doctrinal sophistry which was brought by the Hellenic Spirit to Christian Theology.
When the East which is identified by its likeness to clear simple thoughts, the Hellenic culture was a scourge upon it from religious point of view because of exchanging the simple Semitic commandments of Jesus Christ to a doctrine surrounded by difficult schools of thoughts, filled with doubts which lead to feeling despair, even shook basic doctrine itself. When the last news of the new revelation appeared suddenly in the desert, the eastern Christianity which mixed with cheating and falsity and soaked in the inside divisions and its basic principals shook, and its men grabbed by despair from doubts. Christianity was no longer able to resist and tempting this new religion which (Islam) with one hit which abstract all trivial doubts and presents great materialistic privileges besides its simple clear basics which do not accept controversy. From then on, the East left Jesus Christ and dives into the arms of the Prophet of Arabs(peace be upon him). Arnold also presented the testimony of the American Philosopher, John Taylor, (1753-1824), who said: "It is easy to consider why the new religion (Islam) spreads quickly in Africa and Asia. The scholastic theologians in Africa and Levant.
Exchanged religion of Jesus by difficult metaphorical religions by trying to wage wars against corruption of this era by clarifying the preference and how high ranking is Celibacy as the angels. Therefore Priesthood is isolation from this world is the way to holiness and the filth is an attribute to purity. In fact, polytheists are who worship groups of martyrs, priests and angels. Even the elites were hermaphrodites and corruption was among them. The middle class was exhausted by taxes. There is no hope for slaves in their present and future times. Islam relieves, by the will of Allah, all these superstitions and corruption. Islam is a revolution over polemics in doctrines and a powerful argument against Holiness of Priesthood as if it was considered the head of Piety. Islam declares its basics which call to the Oneness of Allah and His Mighty. Also it declares His Mercy and Justice. Islam calls people to obey orders and believe in Allah with submission to Him. Islam declares responsibility of man to all his deeds and there is another life and a Day to be asked of what man already did in this life. For the evil doers is a painful punishment. Islam imposes prayers, charity, and fasting and good deeds and renounces the false deeds and bad manners and the sophistry in religion. Islam exchanges priesthood by courage and gives slaves a hope and brotherhood to humanity and presents consciousness to basic facts which human nature be based on.
----------------------------------------------------------------
When the great man of the Vatican –the Professor of philosophy –had ignored the Rationality (Reasoning) of Islam as it is in its sources, then why he ignored all writings of the Western Scholars in this field, these writings are famous and published in different Western languages which the Pope of the Vatican mastered?! Is "the purpose" is " the disease" which makes the Pope ignored the "Western article" in Rationality of Islam and irrationality in Christianity which Islam wins over it?! Oh! It is not only ignorance or ignored. This is because the Pope of the Vatican Benedict XVI makes his judgment on Islamic belief that it is irrational and illogic and it is "Blind, heathen belief"!.. He depends on a text attributed to the Imam, philosopher, and jurist, Ibn Hazm, the Andalusian , (384-456/994-1064), the Pope said: Ibn Hazm went to say that God does not committed by His word and there is nothing to commit Him to explain the Truth and then the Pope commented in his lecture on this idea which was attributed to Ibn Hazm by saying, comparing this "idea" by his Christian belief, : "The final say in discussing around Ideological Shift by using violence is in that failing to act according "mind" is a matter opposite to nature of God…but according to Islamic laws, that God Has Absolute Highness. That God's will must not according to our demands, including Rationality". The Pope concluded his saying by describing Islamic faith by "Blind, heathen belief" by his phrase: "In the matter of the God's will –in Islam- must worship in a blind heathen form"!! Then according to this immoral judgment- not only unjust-on Islamic faith, then we must stop:
The Pope Benedict XVI, the Professor of philosophy who worked in an academy. This academy has its traditional scientific search work. This is before his engagement in the priesthood. He was in Vatican, before papacy, the Dean of Cardinals College. From the scientific search traditions which are known by –even the beginners in this field- must return in testifying by texts in its original sources. Does the Pope of the Vatican do this? He is the Professor of philosophy when he cited the words of Ibn Hazm and gave his judgment on Islamic faith by his previous words according to the above "testimony". The Professor of philosophy –the supreme pontiff of the Vatican betrayed secretariat of scientific research and depended on "false one and false testimony". The Pope did not return to Ibn Hazm's translated books into different western languages, but that Professor depended on "Method of relating sayings according to someone and then passed to another one …etc." He the Pope returned to a libanese Chrsitian called (Adel Theodore Khoury), who was not –himself- returned to the original sources of Ibn Hazm but he took the words from a French researcher in Islamittes who is called (Arnaldez). This is an error and betrayal to scientific research traditional work when he talks in a philosophical lecture about "Faith-mind relationship" in the University which he teaches philosophy to academic professors, and then according to this error and the false testimony, his ignored immoral judgment on Islamic belief which a milliard and a half are believe in came out.This Islamic belief which its spread haunts the sleep of the Pope in his European home. I thought for the first-according to my good thinking in the Pope's academic honesty, that the matter was only a misunderstanding to the attributed thought of Iba Hazm and I thought that Iban Hazm was defending the Absolute Allah's Will and Ability in confronting the Isolationists who said: It is the MUST to Allah doing good and the Best, the matter I thought about is that they talked about limitation of Allah's Absolute Ability and Will and it was only that Ibn Hazm refused their talk. But for me, I went to test the (Truth) in this talk when the Pope attributed it, transmitting it from the Catholic professors, Adel Theodore Khoury and Arnaldez. It was not an easy test scientific error when he attributed it to Ibn Hazm without mentioning the book where came with these words?
Ibn Hazm wrote tens of books. Some of these books (folders) each has tens. In which of them is what the Pope attributed to him? In any of the pages? In what of the editions can I find what the Pope attributed to Ibn Hazm? In what of the languages which Ibn Hazm's thought were translated to the Pope translated these words?? The most dangerous point in the Pope's judgment-the professor of the Philosophy-on the "Faith" in Islam is what make me rely on experience to deal with the sources of these thoughts till Allah guides me to find the source that Ibn Hazm spoke in this subject in his book (The Final saying in Religions, passions and sects) and in it is the great surprise when I discovered the clear lie in the clear intellectual assassination which was by the supreme Pontiff and the Catholic professors who the Pope transform from against thoughts of Ibn Hazm around Allah's absolute ability and His unlimited ability. Intellectual assassination parallel is like to say: "Don't pray!" and "Woe to those who pray"!!.. Ibn Hazm had not thinking to say: "Allah doesn't committed with His word and nothing can make Him to declare the TRUTH to us", then Ibn Hazm did not say that Allah's will is illogical, unjust and worse, but Ibn Hazm distinguished the limited human ability with Allah's ability which is unlimited and Ibn Hazm then assured in the same time with clear pretexts the harmony between Allah's will with His wisdom, mercy, just, logic and mind. Because Allah-the Almighty-with His absolute ability doesn't make unjust, lie and futile which is not suitable to His Highness and His beautiful, perfect and honorable attributes. Then Allah doesn't do what is opposite to wisdom, mind and logic. Because these deeds are attributed to human beings, not to Allah –the Almighty- who has mercy. Allah doesn't oppress, doesn't say indecency and evil. Allah perfected everything He creates. The sources of Ibn Hazmin in his clear point of view in "Faith" in Islam when he said:"The belief in Allah's will and Ability are endless without limitation. In the same time, Allah –the Almighty-doesn't surpass wisdom, mercy, just, logic and mind in their meanings at those who realize and His rationales. To discover "Ill thought" and "the methodological error" and "the great lie" which the professor of the Philosophy and the supreme Pontiff and his men fell in, we metion in the following the pretexts of Imam Ibn Hazm around Allah's ability and will in Islam and Muslim doctrine. To who ask: Is Allah's absolute ability- able to do anything- makes Him to lie, for example, in His ability to do that? Ibn Hazm said on replying:(Allah does what He wants and He is able to do anything. Allah says: "For He is All Knowing, All Powerful". Allah calls Himself that He is able, He-the Almighty-doesn't have limits. Limitation of the Ability of Allah is not permitted to Him in anyway. When for anyone to ask: "What safety you are in, in spite of Allah's ability to do unjust, lie? This is impossible for Him to do or He will do it, only then all facts are incorrect and everything Allah says to us is a lie." Ibn Hazm replies on this question by saying: (Our reply on this is that Allah is able to do, but He doesn't do. Allah is not unjust, is not to lie. Allah told us that His words are perfect, honest and just and nothing can change His words. Allah is ABLE and everything He able to do is a must on Him to do. All who believes that Allah is "the TRUTH" unanimously believe that Allah doesn't lie or unjust and all creatures-ancient and modern-that doesn't make unjust or lie. The evidence that Allah is unlike any of His creatures in any of these attributes is that all creatures are unable to do many of things. Inability is an attribute of creatures, but Allah totally isn't. No-one of His creatures is able by himself to do what he is told to do. Only then, it is Allah the Almighty is able to do what He is asked to do. Also, lying and unjust is from attributes of His creatures. Certainly, these attributes aren't for Allah. Allah saves us from unjust, lie or do anything He didn't do it even with His ability to do it).
These above are the pretexts of Ibn Hazm, the Andalusian around "Faith" in Islam with absolute Allah's ability and limitless of His ability. Allah the Almighty is above disability of human beings and able to do anything. Allah creates everything by certain measures and He the Almighty promises to be merciful. Allah says: "It is God Who has sent down the Book in truth, and the Balance (by which to weigh conduct"Surah Al-Shora: verse (17) and "And sent down with them the Book and the Balance (of Right and Wrong), that men may stand forth in justice" Surah Al-Hadeed: verse (25). Then, no contradiction between Allah's absolute ability and wisdom, logic and all of like all of what the wise can understand. This is "the Truth" ignored by the Pope of the Vatican, the professor of Philosophy and his transgression attribution over Imam Ibn Hazm words that the Imam didn't say in any of his books.
Ibn Hazm said: (Allah-the Almighty-told us that His words are perfect and just and on-one to exchange it), but the Pope transgresses over Ibn Hazm when he attributes to him that Ibn Hazm said: (Allah doesn't need to commit with even His word). Not only this transgression (unjust). But the Pope elevates to generalize these words on "Faith" in Islam and announces it as "Blind, heathen faith". And not only in words of Ibn Hazm, but to generalize it on Islam and Muslims! This strange transgression is based on a heavy weighed scientific scandal. There is no strength except in Allah the Almighty.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it suitable for the Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican quoted slurs on the Prophet of Islam (Peace be upon him) came by only bad inhumane and the evil? Who then urged him to spread Islam by sword?
The geographical plan of Islamic world told us that four-fifth of the Muslim people had not conquered by Islamic army, nor had it known in its long history, by wars or conquer. But Islam entered and spread in by a good example and good manners which Islam came by which being carried to these countries by Islamic commercials, scientists and Sufis. As facts of history told us about Islamic conquers that these conquers were against colonial and cultural domination which conquer the Orient and colonize it and looting it for ten centuries from Alexander the Great (356-324 B.C) in the fourth century before Christ to Heraclius, (610-641 A.D.) in the seventh century. These facts also said that all Islamic wars were only against armies of Byzantine and Persian colonization. None of these wars against people of any of the countries of the East. Not only this, but facts told us that the eastern countries stood with the Islamic armies against the Romans, Byzantines occupiers because their people saw the Islamic Opening is freedom of theirs from Roman plunder and freedom of the East from Byzantine conquer and freedom of Eastern Christianity of people intentions from religion persecution. Not only this but genocide which was practiced by the Roman Church against Eastern Christianity. The Eastern nations even they are still Christians stood side by side with Muslim armies and the priest of the East witnessed the Islamic Conquer (Opening) that Opening is "Safety" to eastern Christianity which was persecuted by the Roams. Also, it is freedom to Eastern Churches which was raped by the Romans. This Islamic Opening is as a Godly punishment-by Islamic hands- to the Romans and their transgression which was practiced against the East and the Easterners for ten centuries. This fact which was ignored by the Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican is witnessed by the Coptic Bishop, John of Nikiu who said: (Allah is the protector of the TRUTH. He the Almighty is careful about the world and he judged the wrong doers and he slipped His mercy from them because of daring to do what they did (the Romans) and He returned them to the hand of Ishmaelite- Arab Muslims-and then Muslims raised and awarded Egypt. Heraclius was sad that day because of the Romans defeat. And Allah's orders, Heraclius became sick and fill dead. Amr Ibn Al-Ass, (574-664) day by day became strong and he took taxes within limits and he did not take money of Churches and he didn't commit anything in looting and protected Churches along the Time). And Benjamin the Bishop of Alexandria (39/659) who still fugitive by the chase of Romans for thirteen years till the Islamic Opening which made him safe and returned back to his office in the Church. This opening returned back to him their Churches raped by Romans and he gave a ceremony in monastery of Makarios after being free and he said: "I found safety and calmness in Alexandria which I looked for after persecutions and injustice which the aggressors made".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The bishop, John of Nikiu described the happiness of Egyptians by the victory of Muslims on Romans and their delight of freeing Benjamine, the Patriarch, and the returning of the churches and monasteries to people of Egypt. He said: (The Patriarch of Alexandria entered with Egyptians to Alexandria after his flight from Romans for thirteen years, i.e. in the thirteenth year of his exile and he walked to his churches and visited it all. All people said that this exile and the victory of Islam was because of the injustice of Heraclius, the king, and because of the oppression of Orthodox upon the hands of Cyrus, the patriarch appointed by Romans in Egypt and because of this, Romans perished and Muslims prevail in Egypt). Also, bishop Michael the Syriac testified that after five centuries from the Islamic victory. He said in the last half of the 12th century(A.D): (This is because of God's vengeance who is unique in His power and Omnipotence Who directs the human nation as well as He likes. When God saw the evil of Romans who looting our churches and rob our monasteries and properties and their descention of punishments upon Egyptians without mercy or pity. God sent sons of Ishmael from the south to freeing us from Romans. Our success was not easy to get rid from Romans' oppression and evil against us and again returning of Peace and Security). In this way, Michael, the Great, yacoubi Patriarch of Antioch: (The Finger of Allah in the arab conquer after Eastern Churches experienced Islamic Rule for five centuries as Tomas Arnold said.
Sir Tomas Arnold, (1864-1930), as a witness upon the impression of Islamic victory said: (It is truthful to say that non-Muslims benefit, generally, in the shade of Islamic Ruling by a degree of tolerance in Europe, unique, before modern ages. The still presence of Christian sects between Muslims indicates that persecutions experienced, from time to time upon fanatics were returned to local circumstances more than the result of principals of fanaticism and intolerance). The German argumontal Orientalist, Adam Metz, (1869-1917), with saying: (The Christian are who rule the Islamic Land). The faire testimonies continued to Islamic Opening from religious men, non-Muslims historians till the 20th century. Jacob Nakhla Rofila, (1847-1905), a Coptic writer quotes saying in his book "History of Coptic Nation": (When Arabs fix their feet in Egypt, Amr Ibn Al-Ass began in calming people hearts and gaining their trust and brought close to him the wise Egyptian men and responded their demands. The first thing of what he did was his recalling Bejamine , the Patriarch, who disappeared since time of Heracius. Amr wrote a secure for him and sent it in all Egypt calling him to come safe. When Benjamine came, he went to meet Amr and thanked him his favor and became a supporter to Amr. Amr disposed the ex-Patriarch who appointed by Heraclius and posed Benjamine in his status with dignity and honor. Benjamine had wisdom, knowledge and was mindful to the extent that some called him (The wise). When Amr assured wisdom of Benjamine, he brought him close and invited and consoled him in what was important and related to the nation. Copts accounted favor of Amr and Amr used honorable men of them in managing the nation and regulating a justifiable government guaranteeing rest for people. Amr divided Egypt into divisions appointing a Coptic ruler upon each to look after their cases and judge between them. Amr also arranged trial and appellate boards of honorable people and appointing deputies from Copts and gave them rights in managing their special Coptic cases according their religious ritual. Copts are in civil independence and freedom and this is an advantage they hadn't before in the days of Romanian nation.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Amr Ibn Al-Ass imposed taxes upon Egypt justifiably and he did it by installment within certain times to avoid bothering people. Grenerally, Copts on era of Amr Ibn Al-Ass felt comfortable and this was not like ever before. These are testimonies wrote by Copts and Orientalists. Eye witnesses were within them in these Islamic Openings: These openings were saved the Eastern Church from annihilation of Romans, and returned back its legitimacy, openness and freedom after Romanian's treating it as a "Heresy". Michael the Syriac, the Great, quoted saying: The Romanian emperor didn't allow our Monophysite church (saying that Christ has only one nature) to appear and didn't listen to complaints of bishops concerning looted churches. For this God avenged him. Freedom of Christian Churches and monasteries from Romanian rape, not because of Muslims captured it as places of worshipping, but returned it to Christians to the extent –they said- that seventy thousands priests of monasteries of Wadi El-Natron went to meet Amr with their crutches supported by (i.e. revered Priests) to hold hands out to Amr who wrote a book of security to them. They had it till now. These Islamic Opening freed people who became partners in ruling their nation and regained civil, legal, and judicial independence who were deprived from it for centuries under Romanian ruling.
Social justice was regained to nation after managing taxes by installment and within certain times. It was paid in two times after they were being paid fourteen times a year for Romans.
The Eastern Christian Churches styles and their bishops regained. Amr Ibn Al-Ass isolated Romanian colonial Patriarch, Bejamine, the Patriarch was back on his post in its national Egyptian Church. The argumonal German orientalistdescribed Christians within the shade of Islamic nation by saying: Christians were ruled Islamic nation. Because those Christians were deprived of their civil, political, legal, judicial, cultural, and linguistic freedom for centuries which their nation was
under the reign of Byzantine Romanians. By this, receiving of Islamic men by the Oriental nations as conquers. With another quote of the Christian historian, Jack Tagar, (1918-1952) : That Copts received Arabs as freeing after Arabs guaranteed them –after their entrance-their religious freedom and reduced taxes. The Islamic Law helped Copts who wanted to be Muslims and mixed them within Muslims by exempting them from taxes. But who were still sincere for Christianity, Arabs helped them living by facilitating managing national income.
Even the Pope Shinouda III, (1923), of Alexandria, the Pope of Coptic Orthodox Church-the the Greatest of the Oriental Churches who wrote on the justice of Islam and its tolerance and justice of Muslim Caliphs and rulers with Muslims and non-Muslims. He said about justice of Omar Ibn Al-khattab, the second just Caliph, (23-40 H/584-644 A.D.): We saw in Islamic history clear examples on Islamic tolerance we mentioned that when Omar near to die, his will to the next Caliph-after him-to people of the Book by two commands: The first command: the fulfillment of promises given to them, the second command was not to burden them with things over their abilities.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"When Al-Waleed Ibn "Uqba was a prince appointed on Taghlib (an Arabian tribe of Christian people by Umar Ibn al-Khattab. "Uqba threatened people of Taghlib, but Umar dismissed him to avoid his evil. This is an example of Muslims' justice with whoever people in whatever religion they believe in.
Umar Ibn al-Khattab passed away and his life ended and his Caliphate ended, but the good he did will not die absolutely but people still remember and forever what he did", the Pope Shenouda said.
The Pope Shenouda talked about tolerance of Muawiyah Ibn Abi-Sufyan, (20-60 Hijri/603-680 A.D.) with non-Muslims saying: "His personal doctor was a Christian and he (Muawiyah) chose a Christian discipline for his son Yazid and a Christian priest discipline for his son Khalid".
The Pope Shenouda also said about Umayyad Caliph, Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan, (26-86 Hijri/646-705 A.D.):"He appointed John of Damascus, (55-122Hijri/675-740 A.D.)as an adviser. Abd al-Malik chose a famous teacher called "Athanasios" as a discipline for his brother Abd el Aziz. When Abd el-Aziz became a prince over Egypt, he took Athanasios as an adviser. Akhtal, (19-90Hijri/640-608 A.D.) was a famous Christian poet and he was among group of Jarir (the famous poet, 28-110Hijri/640-708 A.D.)and A-Farazdaq, (110-728 A.D.) and this group was famous on era of Umayyad Dynasty. Akhtal, the Christian, when entered Muslim mosques, Muslims stood –out of respect-for his knowledge as Islamic History wrote.
The Pope Shenouda also testified that Umayyad Caliph, Hisham ibn Abd al-Malik, (71-125Hijri/690-743 A.D.) saying: "He built a house for the Patriarch beside his palace and he listened to his prayers".
The Pope Shenouda also testified that in Abbasid Dynasty, Abou Ja'afar Al-Mansur, (136-158 Hijri/753-774A.D.) saying:"His personal doctor was a Christian called Jurjis, the father of Bukhtishu. Harun al-Rashid, the Caliph, (149-193Hijri/766-809 A.D.) was always saying:"O' People, whoever of you need something, he could speak of it to Jibrail because I wouldn't let him down. Yuhanna ibn Bukhtishu was famous on Harun al-Rashid days till the days of al-Mutawakkil, (206-247Hijri/821-881 A.D.). All these Caliphs invited Yuhanna to their tables and they didn't eat without him. Hunayn ibn Ishaq was the most famous doctor in Islamic Era. They said Hunayn was Hippocrates or Galenus. Hunayn learnt jurisprudence on the hand of Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal, (164-241Hijri/780-855 A.D.), also learnt Arabic on hand of Sibawayh, (148-180Hijri/765-796 A.D.), and he became eloquent in Arabic".
The Pope Shenouda testified also that Tulunid and its founder Ahmad ibn Tulun, (220-270Hijri/834-884 A.D.) who liked Copts and chose a Christian man to build his mosque and to build aqueduct and many establishments. He always went to visit the monastery of Al-Qusayr and he was related tidily to its Monk. The Egyptian monasteries always are sites of meeting of Caliphs and princes and they loved to spend many of times there and made friends with their monks and bishops.
The Pope Shenouda also testified that Ikhshidid and its founder Muhammad ibn Tughj Al-Ikhshid, (268-334Hijri/882-946 A.D.) who built churches and concerned with its restoration.
The Pope Shenouda also testified Fatimid Dynasty saying:" I couldn't deny caring of Fatimid Caliphs building churches and its restoration.
The Pope end his testimony for Islamic History and its tolerance by saying:"Also Caliphs and Muslim rulers established the unity of nation and caring for it".
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Has he, the Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican read these testimonies, historical and contemporary about these facts before his slander upon Islam and the Prophet Muhammad Peace be upon him and its propagation by the sword? If the man ignored the Ancient Eastern heritage, modern and the contemporary, then why he ignored the modern fairy western writings about Islamic Openings which clarify that propagation of Islam comes peacefully even without preaching missionary foundation to preach Islam?
George Sale, (1697-1736 A.D.) who translates Quran into English quoted saying: "Muhammad' law inevitably welcomed by the world. Those who imagined Islam propagated by sword were greatly betrayed ". The famous argumonal British Orientalist, Sir Tomas Arnold, said: "The idea spread about that the sword is being able to make people convert to Islam is far from belief. The phenomenon of Islamic doctrine stead fasts to tolerance and religious freedom for all religions and its followers. It was said that Justinian, (483-565), the Great Roman Emperor, who ordered assassination of two hundred thousands of Copts of Alexandria and the persecution of his successors burdened many to leave to desert. The Islamic Openings brought a life of religious freedom to those Copts. This freedom was not a century before. It was appeared that Copts in the first days of Muslim ruling was somehow moderate and nothing witnessed of any conversion from their old religion to Islam in a wide range, but was of persecution of their modern rulers, those have not tolerance.. But many of those Copts converted to Islam before completion of Opening –at that time Alexandria was resisting those Muslim who came to open Egypt-. Many of Copts followed their brothers in Islam after this by few years. Not only this, but also Sir Tomas Arnold proved that Western Christianity was propagated by violation and sword.
Charlemagne, (742-814 A.D.) imposed Baptism on Saxon pagans by sword. In Denmark, Cnut, the king, (995-1035 A.D.) and the "Brethren of Sword" and others from Crusades who used sword and fire in Christianize Russian pagans. And those cavalries of Christianity [ordo fratram Miliuechris] imposed upon people of Livonia a decree to initiate a sect in isle of Amboyna (Rajats) in 1699A.D. when Valentyn directed some of those pagans into church to baptize them but something else happened –persecution and forced Christianization replacing calm calling to Allah. In Norway, King Olaf Tryggvesson (south of Norway) in Viken (963-1000 A.D.) slaughtered all who refused to embrace Christianity, or chopping their hands and legs or exiled displaced them. With these ways, Christianity propagated in Viken.
Saint Louis, (1214-1270), advised popularity that when anyone heard someone spoke ill of Christianity, he must stab him out of defense. In Hungary, King Charle Robert, forced people (Pshjard) after 1340 A.D. to embrace Christianity after they were being Muslims or to leave his country. In Montenegro, all Muslims stead fast on Islam, their bishop ruler, D. Petrovich, (1703 A. D.), annihilated people to convert to Christianity on Christmas Eve. In Russia, King Vladimir, (988 A.D.) imposed Christianity upon people, masters and slaves, rich and poor, all dragged to Baptism once the King embraced Christianity. Religious freedom was not known in Russia before 1905 A.D., and the punishment of conversion from Christianity iod deprivation of all civil rights and imprisonment with hard labor between eight to ten years. In Ethiopia, King Saif Ar'ad, (1342-1370 A.D.) imposed execution upon Muslims who refused to convert to Christianity or to leave his country. Also, its King, "John", (1880 A.D.) who forced nearly fifty thousands Muslims to baptize, also forced a half million from "Jala tribe" to convert into Christianity.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, which of both religions, Islam or Christianity were propagated with sword, O Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican and these western testimonies which relate facts that how rationality is the secret in propagation of Islam? How sword is the tool in propagation of Christianity, especially in Europe and in your home land, Prussia, which sword and fire were tools in propagation of Christianity by "Brethren of Sword"! It means, your grand fathers, O Supreme Pontiff of Vatican who embrace Christianity by force and under threat of sword and fire! Then is it permitted for you or anyone else-with these western testimonies – the claim that Islam was propagated with sword and proportioned this illusion and lies to the Prophet of Mercy, the messenger of Islam, Muhammad, peace be upon him?! Then, why he, the Supreme Pontiff of Vatican did not ponder upon and he is the Professor of Greek Philosophy. How propagation of Islam with sword and with the survival of all Christian sects, Churches and synagogues even man0made religions in the East of Islamic nation through Islamic History?! It was issued by the (National Institute of demographic studies) in Catholic France a book titled "Christians and Jews in Arabic and Turkish Islamic History" to prove with facts, numbers and statistics that the percent of Muslims in Islamic nations, Egypt and the Arab East and Persia after a century from Islamic Openings and the Islamic Nation which is not exceed 20% from residents!! The n, where is Islamic Sword which they claim that it is the only tool to spread of Islam and they accusation to the Prophet of Islam peace be upon him?
The facts of Islamic History are facts but not theories. These facts said that calling to Islam in Mecca for thirteen years –which is more than the half of this call-Muslims assumed all kinds of torment, torture, siege, and sedition in religion without materialistic resistance against this torment and torture, not only this but also the Prophet of Islam supplicate Allah for those who torture him and his companions with his saying, "O, Allah guide my people, they don't know"!!
The Islamic Immigration from Mecca to Madina and those immigrations which preceded it to Abyssinia were an uprooting, forced and emergency landing and an exile from home and not a voluntary departure and it has been decided when pagans conspiracy reached its peak when Quraish decided to prison the Prophet or assassinate or exile him from Mecca, Allah said:" Remember how the unbelievers plotted against thee, to keep thee in bonds, or slay thee, or get thee out (of thy home). they plot and plan", Surah Al-Anfal, verse no.30, and all options means "death". Prison is moral execution, as well as the exile from home is an execution by deprivation from home and the rights to live.
Islamic nation under Prophetic leadership practiced fighting to defend against those fight against religion and against seduction (i.e. religion), Allah said:" Persecution is worse than murder", Surah Al-Baqara, verse no. 191 and against those who exiled Muslims from their home. The exile is equal to death, Allah said:" If we had ordered them to sacrifice their lives or to leave their homes, very few of them would have done it", Surah Al-Nissa', verse no66, and for this permission to defend themselves against aggression of pagans and to remove injustice, Allah said:" To those against whom War is made, permission Is given (to fight), because They are wronged; and verily, God is Most Powerful For their aid39 They are) those who have Been expelled from their homes In defiance of right, (For no cause) except That they say. Our Lord Is God40, Surah Al-Hajj, and not only this but it confined to only "defend against religion and nation, Allah said:" It may be that God will grant love (and friendship) between you and those whom ye (now) hold as enemies. For God has power (over all things); and God is Oft Forgiving, Most Merciful7God forbids you not, with regard to those who fight you not for (your) Faith nor drive you out of your homes, from dealing kindly and justly with them: for God loveth those who are just8 God only forbids you, with regard to those who fight you for (your) Faith, and drive you out of your homes, and support (others) in driving you out, from turning to them (for friendship and protection). It is such as turn to them (in these circumstances), that do wrong", Surah Al-Momtahena, verses nos.7,8,9
---------------------------------------------------------------------
In this "Defensive Fight" which all battles were around Madina, the Capital of Islamic Nation. In defense of religion and nation against polytheists, who creep to fight this religion and Madina. Islam decreed an Ethical Constitution for fight since fourteen centuries defore humanity acknowledged the ethics of fighting. The Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him said: "Fight in the name of Allah in Allah's cause. Fighting polytheists (transgressors)-commit no excesses in your religion (i.e. do not betray, no treason, no mutilation (i.e. bodies of an enemy after death) not to kill a baby. The Prophet peace be upon him prohibited killing women, boys and girls (related by Ibn Malik in his book "al-Moata'a") and related by Muslim as authentic.
Abou Bakr quoted saying, (51before hijra-13 Hijri/ 573-634 A.D.) a decree concerning "Fighting Ethics" in his advice to Yazid Ibn Abi Sufyan's army, (18Hijri/ 639 A.D.) when he went to Al-Sham to free the land and people from Romanian Colonialism, he said: "You will find people claim themselves priests, leave them to what they do and I say to you: Not to kill women, nor a baby, an old and not to cut a fruity tree, not to condemn a house, not to kill a goat or an animal except only what to kill for eat and not to burn a palm tree and not to betray and not to be a coward" (related by Malik in al-Moata'a.
Islam came with refuse philosophy of "Conflict" in solving problems. Because "Conflict" leads that someone strong kills or hurt another weak and that one becomes strong. As a result of it, there will not be diversity, plurality and difference which Allah makes as a decree from his creed which will not be exchanged or convert. Islam chooses the decree of "Check one set of people by means of another" instead of the philosophy of "Conflict". This creed is a social movement replaces attitudes and restores balance to relationships keeping the decree of diversity, differentiation, plurality and difference, Allah said in Surah Fussellat, verses:" Who is better in speech than one who calls (men) to God, works righteousness, and says, I am of those who bow in Islam?33 Nor can Goodness and Evil be equal. Repel (Evil) with what is better: then will he between whom and thee was hatred become as it were thy friend and intimate3 4". And within the frame of the philosophy of this Peaceful Creed (not "Conflict"). Islam exposes to idolatrous polytheism to open the doors to free religious calling-any religion-Allah said in Surah Kaferoon:" Say: O ye that reject Faith 1 I worship not that which ye worship 2 Nor will ye worship that which I worship 3 And I will not worship that which ye have been wont to worship 4 Nor will ye worship that which I worship 5 To you be your Way, and to me mine 6", and in Surah al-Kahf, verse29:" Say, the truth is from your Lord: let him who will, believe, and let him who will, reject (it)".
And within the frame of Islamic philosophy, Islam divides polytheism and polytheists into three divisions:
1- The neutral polytheists: who do not identify their position from Islam because they do not know its reality. Those have their right to learn about and then to be free to take whatever position they want, Allah said in Surah repentance verse 6:
"If one amongst the Pagans ask thee for asylum, grant it to him, so that he may hear the word of God; and then escort him to where he can be secure. that is because they are men without knowledge".
2- The polytheists who make pacts with Muslims. Polytheists who do not denunciate their pacts and do not betray, honesty must be given to them,Allah said in Surah Repentance, verse4:
" But the treaties are) not dissolved with those pagans with whom ye have entered into alliance and who have not subsequently failed you in aught, nor aided any one against you. so fulfil your engagements with them to the end of their term: for God loveth the righteous".
3- Polytheists who betray their pacts with Muslims and transgress over Muslims and tempt them in their religion, and exile them from their lands. Those only who Muslims fight against them "Defensive Fight" to repel their aggression against them. Allah said about them:
" In a believer they respect not the ties either of kinship or of covenant it is they who have transgressed all bounds" Surah Repentance, verse:10, and:" Will ye not fight people who violated their oaths, plotted to expel the Apostle, and took the aggressive by being the first (to assault) you?" Surah Repentance, verse:13. in Surah Al-Baqara,verse190:" Fight in the cause of God those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for God loveth not transgressors", and said: " The prohibited month for the prohibited month, and so for all things prohibited, there is the law of equality. if then any one transgresses the prohibition against you, transgress ye likewise against him. but fear God, and know that God is with those who restrain themselves." Surah Al-Baqara,verse194
Islamic position against refusal of the philosophy of "Conflict" and to call to this Peaceful Creed, Islam excelled in doing exception in fighting. This fighting is not a principal and isn't a fixed matter, but Islam makes fighting hateful and the Prophetic tradition assured this fact by Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him saying: (Do not wish to meet enemy but ask Allah peace. When you meet them, keep steadfast and remember Allah much) related by al-Daramy.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also, the creed of humility to Allah and tolerance in the peak moments of victory over the enemies who their history with Islam and Muslims was filled with evils…then the Prophet peace be upon him entered Mecca on the Great Day of Opening prostrated to Allah on his camel and he said to its people at that time (8Hijri/629 A.D.) and to polytheists: "Go, you are free"!!
With Islamic philosophy which ruled the relations of Islamic calling with others…and with these ethical precepts which were ruled "The Defensive Fight" that Muslims have to defense religion and nation and because of all this the victims of all battles happened in the Prophetic time (they are twenty battles and skirmishes) in nine years not exceed 386 victims of both sides (victims of both polytheists and Muslims)!! But the victims of sacred battles within Catholics-the ancestors of the Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican-and the Protestants were 10 millions according statistics of the French philosopher, Voltaire, (1694-1778 A.D.) i.e. forty percent from people of the middle of Egypt!!
The field studies facts of victims of battles of the "Defensive Fight" in the Prophetic time are to dissipate that great illusion of those who said that about the propagation of Islam by sword and the following table of these battles and the number of victims did not exceed victims of an accident in a small town:
No.
Name of battle
Victims of polytheists
Victims of Muslims
Year of battle
1
Skirmish of Abdullah Ibn Jahsh
1
-
2 Hijri
2
Bard battle
70
14
2 Hijri
3
Al-Souiq battle
-
2
2 Hijri
4
Skirmish of Ka'ab Ibn al-Ashraf
1
-
3 Hijri
5
Uhud battle
22
70
3 Hijri
6
Hamra'a al-Asad
1
-
3 Hijri
7
Skirmish of al-Rajee'
-
7
3 Hijri
8
Skirmish of Maona's well
-
27
3 Hijri
9
Trench battle
3
6
5 Hijri
10
Battle of sons of Quraidha
600 (those 600 victims died by arbitration as a penalty of treason were out of no.)
-
5 Hijri
11
Skirmish of Abdullah Ibn Ateeq
1
-
5 Hijri
12
Dhi Qerd battle
1
2
6 Hijri
13
Battle of sons of Mostalaq
-
1
6 Hijri
14
Khaibar battle
2
20
7 Hijri
15
Battle of Qura valley
-
1
7 Hijri
16
Mo'ta battle
-
11
8 Hijri
17
Mecca Opening
17
3
8 Hijri
18
Hunayn battle
84
4
8 Hijri
19
Ta'if battle
-
13
8 Hijri
20
Tabook battle
-
-
9 Hijri
Total victims
183
203
Then, where is this sword that the Pope of the Vatican spoke about by saying that it is the worst, evil, and inhuman action that the message of Islam came with? And make (the sword) as a tool to propagate Islam by!!
With all these Islamic Facts and the testimonies of non-Muslims of famous ones from the East and West-historically-till time now-about the peaceful propagation of Islam-and because of its unique and advantageous rationality….Did the Pope of the Vatican ask himself- and he is afraid of propagation of Islam in his home in Europe and afraid of turning Europe to be a part of Islam in this century 21st? Did this man ask himself about the sword which Islam propagated with in Europe at time? Swords of Muslims today, are broken or rusty inside sheaths, but swords of Western Christians today are upon necks of Muslims! Tens of Western military bases are spread in the lands of Islam. Islamic seas and Oceans are occupied by Western fleets…!! And even with the disappearance of Islamic swords and with all transgression of Western swords even on Muslim land, hearts and minds open to Islam in the Pope's home.
That is what Islam does today and did before this in history. And Islam will do tomorrow-insha Allah- O, the Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The third libel which the Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican renounced Islam and its history and civilization was his confusion between "Jihad in Islam" and the "Religious Sacred War" which was known and was practiced by the Western Christianity against the Islamic World .. The Crusades for two centuries time (489-690 Hijri/1096-1291A.D.), which nearly thirty were famous of and resented the initiative of the European World War which were declared by the Catholic Church which European Feudality Knights were its soldiers and subsisted by Commercial European Nations to capture the East and regain it from Islamic Liberation to loot its fortune and to establish colonial settled entities upon Muslim Land. Also, the Catholic Church practiced this "Religious Sacred War" against Protestants, (1562-1629 A.D.). Forty percent of middle European nation were annihilated in ten rounds of this war [ten millions according Voltaire's statistics 1694-1778A.D.)]. Also, this Catholic-Protestant Western Christianity practiced religious sacred war by "Inquisition" against who oppose men of thought, philosophers, and scholars. Millions were annihilated by strangling, burning, dumping or hanging on the "Sacred Pile" for three centuries!!
The Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican confusing between "Islamic Jihad" and the "Religious Sacred Wars" which made the bloodshed of the opposes one of the greatest acts of worship to be closer to bishops and monks and their knights to the Lord to forgive their sins and to capture the "Keys of Peter" to gardens of bliss!! By that confusion, the Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican absolute belief is that Islam was established by violence and terrorism. The time he must according his Supreme Post in the Greatest of Christian Churches, who proclaim studying philosophy and teaching it and talking about "Rationality". It is a must on him to know these simple, known, concrete facts which deny this confusion. These facts are:
There is a distinction in Islam, the Holy Quran, and Arabic Language between: Jihad, fighting, and terrorism:
1- Jihad means to exhort your efforts in any of domains of goodness, righteousness, and reform. To be tender to human beings, animal, plant, and inanimate is Jihad. Honoring parents and resistance to incline to evil is Jihad. Resist the whispers of Satan is Jihad. To build and ornament land is Jihad. To learn science is Jihad. Asceticism of what in hands of others and to be good in work and to your neighbors in spite of variant religions are Jihad. Lesser and greater Pilgrimage are Jihad. To be good to your wife is Jihad. Sincerity in growing up your children is Jihad. To be sincere to Allah is Jihad. Jihad, for this is of extended meaning. It is obligatory in Islam upon Muslim to do what within your ability in any of the previous domains. Really, this is describes in the Holy Quran by the "Greatest Jihad". It isn't the greatest Jihad by sword or fighting. Allah says: "Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness, with the (Quran)" Surah: Forqan:verse no. 52
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
About "Fighting" which is one of many sorts of "Jihad" means: to exhort your efforts, fortune even souls in "Defensive Fighting" against who transgress over Muslims and tempt them out from Islam or exile them from their lands. Allah says in the Holy Quran: "To those against whom War is made, permission Is given (to fight), because They are wronged; and verily, God is Most Powerful For their aid 39 They are) those who have Been expelled from their homes In defiance of right, (For no cause) except That they say. Our Lord Is God. Did not God check one set of people by means of another, There would surely have been Pulled down monasteries, churches, Synagogues, and mosques, in which The name of God is commemorated In abundant measure. God will certainly aid those who aid His (cause); for verily God is Full of Strength, Exalted in Might, (Able to enforce His Will 40": Surah Al-Hajj, and, "There was indeed in them an excellent example for you to follow, for those whose hope is in God and in the Last Day. But if any turn away, truly God is Free of all wants, Worthy of all Praise 6 It may be that God will grant love (and friendship) between you and those whom ye (now) hold as enemies. For God has power (over all things); and God is Oft Forgiving, Most Merciful 7 God forbids you not, with regard to those who fight you not for (your) Faith nor drive you out of your homes, from dealing kindly and justly with them: for God loveth those who are just 8 God only forbids you, with regard to those who fight you for (your) Faith, and drive you out of your homes, and support (others) in driving you out, from turning to them (for friendship and protection). It is such as turn to them (in these circumstances), that do wrong 9": Surah Al-Momtahena, and also says: "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it 216": Surah Al-Baqara. This is the practical meaning of "Fighting" as an Islamic Concept and Belief and according to the general meaning of Jihad as an obligation. For this "Reality" in Islam, Jihad is a permanent, universal duty upon each person. Fighting is a hated exception from the attackers which is imposed on Islam and Muslims. It is an obligation not upon that wouldn't able to fight, but an obligation till sufficient number of fighters. For this "Reality"-reality of alienation of Islam to Peace-is this limited number of victims in all Prophetic battles for nine years as we said before (386 victims of both sides together). Let us to say: the number of people the messenger of Allah, peace be upon him, sent to teach Quran and Islam and the mosques and places prepared by Muslim army for prayer are more in number than that of the victims fall in these battles!!
It was incumbent upon the Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican, the Professor of the philosophy, to beware of the historical facts. He finds a lot in Muslim land and the West, who study Islamic history and specialized in it. He also was incumbent upon him to compare between the victims number in Muhammad's battles (peace be upon him) and victims of his sacred Churches of Protestants (ten millions), besides, these millions (innumerable) of the conflicts and wars of the inquisition and the millions were annihilated by his Christianity in colonizing America (northern, middle and southern) and also, Australia and New Zealand. In addition to the forty millions of African Negros who were captured and kidnapped in chains and were shipped in vessels of animals, which upon their bones, blood and their souls the Western Christian Civilization was raised. Adding to it, sixty millions of victims of the two World Wars on the first half of the 20th century, the First on (1914-1918A.D) and the Second on (1939-1940A.D.). Also, wars are still waged by the Western Institutions of domination, and blessed-or silenced about- by the Western Churches along the Islamic World. In it, all types of internationally prohibited weapons are used: of enriched Uranium, to white phosphorous, to duster bombs, to what Allah only knows from Satanic genius seeds of Western philosophy which the Supreme Pontiff was specialized in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Doesn't he, the Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican-he is a German-read what the worldly famous doctor, Sigrid Hunke, wrote in distinguishing between "Islamic Jihad" and the "Religious Sacred War" in Christianity. She said: (The Islamic Jihad simply isn't like the Religious Sacred War, but Jihad-as the German Muslim, Ahmad Schemeda- said: Jihad is each exhorted effort to install Islam in our souls to be able, in this life, to enter the renewed daily struggle against our forces inclined towards evil and in a global environment around us, Jihad is the well-spring which isn't exhausted when a Muslim draw energy from to be ready to his responsibility, submitting to the will of Allah consciously and with certainty. Jihad is the always awakening conscious to defend Islam and its social legislation upon the land of Islam!!)
Today and after one thousand and two hundred years, still the Western Christian hold on the fabricated fairy tales which related by grandmothers, by who was created it saying that the Arab armies after death of Muhammad, propagate Islam with fire and sword from India to the Atlantic Ocean and the West insisted on it by all ways to: writings and sayings in journals and magazines, by books and publications to public opinion and in modern campaigns against Islam. Allah said: "There is no compulsion in religion", this is a binding word in the Holy Quran, verse no. 256 in Surah Al-Baqara. The main aim from Arabic battles isn't to let people embrace Islam, but to spread Allah's rule over the land by: leaving Christian to his religion and the Jew to his one. It isn't for anyone to forbid them practicing his religious rituals according to Islamic concepts, no one to causing harm to their monks, priests, their monasteries, churches and synagogues. The followers of other religions from Jews and Christians themselves came to embrace Islam and to benefit from its civilization. They insisted with fascination and passion towards Islamic civilization more than the Arabs themselves. They took to themselves Arabic names, clothes, Arabic customs, and Arabic tongue, and they married in Arabic way and they bare witness the two testimonies. Arabic life and its civilization are magnificent, highness, virility and beauty. In brief, the magic characterizes the Arabic civilization regardless of the Arab generosity and tolerance. All these are attractive without resistance.
The magic of social life style attracted Crusade within short time as the testimony of the French Knight, Volscher Elsharty, who said: (We were sons of the Westerners and now we are Easterners), and he went on portrays his feelings by what he had of admiration towards this strange magic and magnificence of Islamic World, the fragrance of its perfumes and colors which send in the euphoria of conscience). He then asked: (Will we returning the depressed West after what Allah bestowed on us and exchange the East by the West?!)
By this, Islam spreads and wasn't by sword or compulsion.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the Supreme Pontiff is still in need to a European testimony to make him learn the difference between "religious sacred Christian War"-a war of coercion to change religion.. to become close to Allah by shedding blood of who antagonize-and the Islamic Jihad, we present the testimony of the European historian, Michael Derserer, which the German scholar, Sigrid Hunke, mentioned during her talking about the practice of the Catholic Patriarchs of the Church especially in Al-Quds (Orshaleem). She said: The great of the preachers of Crusade, Bernard Clairfox, gave his command to soldiers: "Either Christianization or genocide". Michael Derserer, the historian, described Muslims massacre on 1099 in Al-Quds (Orshaleem) upon the hands of Crusade and how was the Patriarch himself run in aisle of Al-Aqsa mosque with his sword dripping blood, killng anyone he found in his way and he didn't stop till reach the Church of Sepulture to wash his hands from the stacked blood repeating the following Psalm of David saying: "Rejoice in the righteous when they see the punishment of the wicked, and wash their (righteous) feet with the wicked blood" and people say: It is true that for a friend is a bonus and in the land Allah rules (Psalm 58:10-11) then the Patriarch performed the Mass saying: It is not made in his life to the Lord in any the greatest sacrifice that the Lord is pleased with. These are "the religious sacred War" which was practiced by Catholic Church against Islam and Muslims which the Patriarch thought they became close to Allah by shedding Muslims blood and which the Supreme Pontiff mix between it and Islamic Jihad.
3-Terrorism means: practicing violence to frighten innocents and secured and peaceful to gain political aims. This is prohibited and a crime in Islam. It is a Western Industry and was practiced by nations and governments not only personal practicing. Islam prohibits frightening secured and practicing violence against by putting an Ethnic Constitution even for the "Defensive Legal War" which in it Islam prohibits killing Muslims who have not role in transgression or fighting. In Prophetic traditions, the Prophet of Islam peace be upon him forbids killing women and kids (related by Malik in Al-Moata'a. Also, the first Caliph, Abu Bakr Al-Siddiqq-as previously said- announced these Islamic Moral values in a constitution of Islamic Equestrian when he advised his leader of the army, Moawyyia ibn abi Sufyan, (18 Hijri/ 639 A.D.) with Kindness. Not only with secured and innocents, but also kind to animals and plant. He said to him: "You will find people claim themselves priests, leave them to what they do and I say to you: Not to kill women, nor a baby, an old and not to cut a productive tree, not to condemn house, not to kill a goat or an animal except only what to kill for eat and not to burn a palm tree and not to betray and not to be a coward (related by Malik in Al-Moata'a).
Where is Islamic terrorism that was built on religious faith which he, the Supreme Pontiff, described the defense of Lebanese Resistance against Zionistic aggression on Lebanon on August, 2006A.D. by "terrorism" when he condemned "terrorism" and "Revenge" and he considered victim as terrorist and the aggression which the internationally prohibited arms: the active Uranium and clustered bombs are but only a revenge but not terrorism!!
Now a year passed by when Benedictius XVI was declared the Pope in the greatest Christian Church and he was silent on the Western Terrorism which claimed as Fundamentalism, Christianity and Zionism legends of annihilation of thousands of Muslims in Iraq, Palestine, Afghanistan, Chechnya, Kashmir, Somalia, Sudan, Philippine, Burma…etc. Terrorism and genocide were practiced by great nations and was motivated by ideology of Crusade and groups of Right Christians.
He is silent and will be-the supreme Pontiff- on Imperial Western terrorism which is supported by Christianity. This terrorism was covering Islamic World's land by military basics and weapons of mass destruction. Also, this terrorism covered Islamic Oceans and seas by vessels and fleets and aircrafts carriers!!
What is the position of the Supreme Pontiff, from this terrorism or is he call it by another name other than terrorism?!
If the Supreme Pontiff's abilities of thinking made him go deep before fourteen centuries to transgress over Islamic faith as a founder of violence and terrorism, then where is his intelligence and his knowledge about "Era of Terrorism" which the French revolution is proud of –the revolution raised in Catholic France-sponsored by the Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican- which is studied in all schools of the world as a great work from works of Western Civilization, without mentioning of even a sign to "National Terrorism" which innovated by the West and still practiced against others till this moment!
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it for someone who is in the position of the Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican that is betraying the Quran describes its verses as "Villain orders"?!!
He makes this with Quran, which came to confirm what preceded it of the heavenly books. Which came as a believer of all the prophecies and messages, Allah says: "We make no distinction (they say) between one and another of his apostles"Al-Baqara:verse:285. Quran speaks about Torah of Moses saying: in it is guidance and light, and about Gospel of Jesus saying: in it is guidance and light. Quran says, Marry, the lady over all women of the world and she is a verse from verses of Allah. Quran speaks about Jesus peace be upon him as a verse from verses of Allah, the day he born on, the day he died on, and the day he will resurrect. Quran also, acknowledges all rituals of people of the book and calls them to One Word, Allah says: "Say: O people of the book come to common terms as between us and you: that we worship none but God; that we associate no partners with him" A-Imran: verse: 64. The Holy Quran did not restrict that "Safety" is only to people of a specific legislation without others of other legislations, but opens the door for pure monotheism and also, to believe in the Unseen, and doing good according to a verse in one of correct heavenly legislation carried by one of messengers of Allah, peace be upon them all, Allah says: "Those who believe (in the Quran), and those who follow the Jewish (scriptures), and the Christians and the Sabians, any who believe in God and the last day, and work righteousness, shall have their reward with their Lord: on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve" Al-Baqara:verse:62. That Allah, who revealed Quran says:
"Verily we shall not suffer to perish the reward of any who do a (single) righteous deed." Alkahf: verse:30.
Is it suitable for fair man with a subjective sight- to describe it as "Villains orders"?! as the Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican did?!
The Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican, Benedictius XVI, ignored the Eastern Arabic and Islamic heritage which testifies Quranic miracle and declares that the Word of Allah is miraculous and still be a miracle. All people can't come by a like of it. This heritage which history preserves words of Imams of eloquence and captains of statements industry like Abu Abd Shams al-Waleed ibn el-Mughira, ( 95 before Hijri-1 Hijri/ 530-622 A.D.), he was one of leaders of Qureish, one of its leaders, and one of Arab judges in era of ignorance, aka "Justice' because he is justice of all Qureish, who testified -even he was a pagan- that Quran when he heard the Prophet recited Surah Ghafir, saying: I swear God that I heard from Muhammad (PBUH) words were not like anyone or Jinn. He (Muhammad) wasn't a priest. We saw priests and his words weren't like theirs. I swear God, he wasn't crazy. We saw and knew craziness. His words weren't like theirs. He wasn't a poet. We knew all poems. He wasn't a one. He wasn't a magician. We saw magicians and their magic. I swear God, his words are sweet, good and accepted. Its origin is rainy and its branches were produce and it (Quran) prevails not second to none. And you, Qureish if you say other than that (about Quran), I believe it is null and void.
And the testimony of Utba ibn Rabi'a ibn Abd Shams Abu Waleed, (2 Hijri/624 A.D.) –he was one of leaders of Pagans of Qureish and Macca –said about Quran when he heard it from the Prophet (PBUH) said: I heard a speech I swear God that I didn't hear the like before. It isn't poem, isn't magic, and isn't divination. I swear God, this speech will prevail.
Also, the testimony of Dr. Taha Hussein, (1306-1393 Hijri/ 1889-1973 A.D.). He is one of famous eloquents in the 20th century, who collected the Western culture to the Eastern culture –upon the uniqueness of the Quran and its prevalence over human creativity- when he said: I said in one of my speeches about the emergence of prose of Arabs, Quran neither poem, nor prose, but it is Quran. It has its ways and special styles in comprehension and picturesque. It has constraints of music that seems to be poem, and the constraints of rhyme that it seems like arranged speech, and it has freedom and rehearsing what it seems to be prose. For this, the pagans of Qureish were betrayed and said that it is poem they are liars. The followers of history of prose were betrayed because they thought Quran is the beginning of Arabic prose, but the real facts are not. If the interested writers –they tried to do-to bring the like of the Quran, they couldn't but laughs and ironic. All eloquents testified that Quran is miraculous throughout history. If it is allowed to the Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican to ignore the Eastern testimonies of uniqueness and miraculous Holy Quran or to ignore the greatest and eternal miracle-the miracle of reforming true mankind and true society. Quran is miraculous because of its speech about unseen and its scientific signs…etc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it to the Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican to ignore what the Westerners wrote in Western languages about the Holy Quran?!
If he read before he said what he said of that strange, astonished, and doubt description of the Quran what the giant of English Culture, Montgomery Watt, after a long journey with the Quran and the Islamic studies what exceeds over a third of a century, saying: Quranic words, in anyway, are neither words of Muhammad, nor the produce of his thinking, but the Word of Allah, the Only, aiming at talking to Muhammad and his contemporaries. Muhammad isn't only but a messenger Allah chooses him to carry the message, at first to people of Macca then to all Arabs. Quran is clear in Arabic. I think Quran by all of the meaning is come from Allah, then it is a revelation. We believe in truthfulness of Muhammad and his sincerity when Montgomery said: Words of Allah aren't the result of good thinking.
It is right and must be for anyone to ask –for the minimum of subjectivity-about slander that the Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican against Allah, the Lord of the world, the Almighty, against the Prophet of Islam who was described by Allah when Allah said: "And thou (standest) on an exalted standard of character" Surah al-Qalam: verse: 4, who was sent as Allah said: "a Mercy for all creatures", and against Islamic faith which is reached to the peak of monotheism and transcendence, and against Muslim thinking and their civilization which illuminate the world and teach humanity and represented the first world on earth for more than ten centuries. Where the truth in the slander was claimed by the Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican? Or the objection is a disease which is uncured by wise thinkers and clever doctors? Or lie becomes a heavy, big industry which brings milliards Allah said:" And have ye made it your livelihood that ye should declare it false?" Surah al- Waqi'a: verse: 82
If it is the judge of the Pope of the Vatican upon the Holy Quran-the preserved book of Allah and the Ummah's text which is for Muslims, their culture and civilization. If we have the right to ask the Pope of the Vatican, the Supreme Pontiff of Catholicism and Professor of philosophy about his opinion in the Old Testimony, which he considered it sacred and worships by reading it, in spite of what the Jewish scholars about books of Torah, that they were no relation between them and the revelation, and no relation between it and Moses, peace be upon him. In this text by Jewish scholars saying: Those books of Torah were from different strata, different times, and different writers. They include nearly three thousand years. No relation between them either in languages or style of writing. The major part of our Torah didn't be written in the desert. Moses didn't write it all. Sayings of Torah not only but Scrolls from different places and times by men, rulers, and different clans and tribes. There were eight scrolls back to many times and they were:
1- Old scroll back to time in the desert of Sinai and were written by one of sons of Ephraim.
2- Scrolls of numbers of tribes.
3- Scrolls of teachings of priests which were added. Till time of Joshua.
4- Scrolls of confessions of Prophets.
5- Scrolls of relatives of hose of David.
6- Scrolls of sayings of Prophets and their groups in Babylon.
7- Scrolls of priests, Prophets of Babylonian captivity.
Chosen texts from time of Maccabean (i.e. the second century before Christ).
------------------------------------------------------------------
Genesis had been written for hundreds of years of Jewish settlement in Palestine; for a long time of tribes' settlement. The writer of Genesis wasn't been before Isaiah (nearly on 734-680 B.C.). For Exodus and Number, both are an address to myths and ancient poetry. The eighty eight chapters in the Torah, from song of Moses in Exodus to the last chapter of the book of Number, are a whole book of the provision of the composite parts of poetry and history and the provisions of the rules of the priests. The nature of evidences in it required growing changes, duplications, and modifications, because the relationship between events was weak and it is difficult for us to understand it. In the whole of the book, Moses's sayings were few to some extend. Also, David's sayings were few in another book attributed to him". This testimony is of Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican, you are worshipping by a book hasn't any relation with revelation or sacredness and it is related to Moses as threads of a spider, even though, you attack the Holy Quran!
If you wish, the Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican, a testimony of another experiment and a scholar in analyzing Torah even with its content of contradictions which negate Torah to be revealed or its sacredness. To you there is a testimony of the famous scholar, Dr. Fouad Hussein Ali, the Professor of Hebrew and Jewish heritage from Cairo University in his book, "Torah, a display and analysis". He said in it: "In the present Torah, no text tells us that Moses is the one who comes with it or it was revealed on him, but the opposite; there were something which go parallel with the opposite of that and from these evidences for example: verse no. 6 from chapter four in Deuteronomy about Moses's death. It is far from being said by him (Moses). In this verse: "No one knows his cemetery up till now". In the tenth verse from the same chapter: "No prophet was raised among Israel like Moses. He was kind more than anyone on earth"! All these verses and the likes indicate that the writer is someone else than Moses, also, a long time between Moses's death and writing Torah which present within our hands today". And from other evidences on that are differences and contradictions in the text as using words like "Yahoa" or "Elohim" and some other words which we know that its meaning defer sometimes according time and place. These words couldn't be issued from one person in one time": The story of Creation in Genesis in the first chapter, in it: Man is the last of creation and a display to the story in the same book, chapter two: Man was the first in creation, then trees, then field animals, then sky birds. The matter makes Torah (as it is now) has different eras and minds. Many sources were used to present it (Torah). Some sources put as it was and others added or deleted from it. From evidences of plurality of these sources is the instability in some of the stories, as the story of the Flood: verse no. 12 from the tenth chapter of Genesis wrote that its duration was 40 days and nights, but in verse no. 24 from the seventh chapter of Genesis, its duration was 150 days. A thousand years between the Oldest manuscript in the present Torah and the original copy of it. In this, certainly, many changes and exchanges were put on Hebrew, the writing language.
These are testimonies of experienced scholars from Jews and others on the book, which you-the Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican, considers it sacred and worship God by it.
---------------------------------------------------------
If only, the Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican, had possessed the courage of Pope Shenouda III, Pope of Alexandria and Patriarch of St. Mark, the oldest and largest of the Eastern Churches-who did not shy away from recognizing and declaring that the Old Testament rolling in all churches of the world-which the books of Apocrypha (books: in the plural sense of the word book) had been removed from the Bible.
The newspaper, "My Nation", a Christian newspaper, in its issue on Sunday, 15th of October 2006, that the Pope Shenouda was asked in one of his weekly lectures on Wednesday, 11th of October 2006, about the Apocrypha in the Bible, Is by this deletion the Bible not distorted? The Pope Shenouda acknowledged that there are some of Apocrypha weren't present in the available copy in our hands. And as a result of its deletion by the Protestants who publish and print the sacred books!!
If only you, the Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican, before attacking on the Holy Quran, the miraculous and the uniquely preserved, had the courage of the Pope Shenouda when you talk about your sacred book (The Old Testament)!! Isn't good for you, the Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican, instead of attacking on the Holy Quran and your slander over its verses to the extent of describing it as: "Commands of orders Villains"-you must occupy yourself by refuting and defending your sacred book(The New Testament) I am not saying against Islamic writings, but against the Western writings which carry tens of evidences of denying reputation and sacredness of your book?!
It is only enough for you that only one of the Western sources, the Encyclopedia Britannica, which said about:
A-Gospel of Mathew: it is doubtedly enough that one as Mathew was the writer of this Gospel (6-697).
B-gospel of Mark: in the best of scripts, from 9 to 20, they are considered additives and the scripts in the end 16:9-20 aren't presented in some of the scripts and instead of it are short clips in other scripts. And there are a dispute around Mark's authorization of Vol.II p.:951-953
C-Gospel of Luke: the author of this Gospel was stayed unknown (Vo.II p.:954)
D-Gospel of John-is the only Gospel which talking about the divinity of Jesus-contrary to other Gospels, in many of important occasions to the extent that Papias, (130 A.D.)of presence of more than John and this Gospel was written by unknown disciple (Vol.II p.:955).
As the Encyclopedia Britannica said that "All the original copies of the New Testament, which were written by their original authors are disappeared", however, it was only 200-300 years which separate events of the New Testament and the contemporary time of writing its scripts. And all the copies of the sacred book before the age of Printing, all the quotes of the Fathers of the Church from books of the New Testament which covered most of it, appeared 150000 differences between texts (Vol.IIp.: 941).
If the previous is only a sign of examples of the Western sources which expose the extent of reputation and trustfulness about your Sacred Book-O, Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican- is it better for you –as is the wise-to look for your house and to present to your people what is reassuring about their book instead of this inappropriate attack on the Holy Quran?! Or are we in front of the famous Arabic proverb which said: (You accused me the affected [diseased] and you fled) O, Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican?!
------------------------------------------------------------------
If the Pope of the Vatican, Benedictius XVI, describes the verses of the Holy Quran by his saying: "Commands of Villain orders", can we ask him about his opinion as a Professor of Philosophy, what within the Old Testament' chapters-which he looks at it as sacred- of the racial bloody thoughts-which had been attributed to Allah, Glory and Exalted be Him(SWT), when He (SWT)commanded sons of Israel to annihilate everything of others: mankind, trees, animals,…From these texts:
Exodus 17-14: And the Lord said to Moses, Make a record of this in a book, so that it may be kept in memory, and say it again in the ears of Joshua: that all memory of Amalek is to be completely uprooted from the earth.
Deuteronomy 13:12 And if word comes to you, in one of the towns which the Lord your God is giving you for your resting-place, …13-15 Then take up arms against the people of that town and give it up to the curse, with all its cattle and everything in it. 13:16 And take all the goods into the middle of its open space, burning the town and all its property with fire as an offering to the Lord your God; it is to be a waste for ever; there is to be no more building there. 13:17 Keep not a thing of what is cursed for yourselves: so the Lord may be turned away from the heat of his wrath, and have mercy on you, and give you increase as he said in his oath to your fathers:
Numbers 33:50 And in the lowlands of Moab by Jordan at Jericho, the Lord said to Moses,
33:51 Say to the children of Israel, When you go over Jordan into the land of Canaan,
33:52 See that all the people of the land are forced out from before you, and put to destruction all their pictured stones, and all their metal images, and all their high places:
33:53 And take the land for yourselves, for your resting-place: for to you I have given the land as your heritage.
33:55 But if you are slow in driving out the people of the land, then those of them who are still there will be like pin-points in your eyes and like thorns in your sides, troubling you in the land where you are living.
33:56 And it will come about that as it was my purpose to do to them, so I will do to you.
Deuteronomy 20:10 When you come to a town, before attacking it, make an offer of peace.
20:11 And if it gives you back an answer of peace, opening its doors to you, then all the people in it may be put to forced work as your servants.
20:12 If however it will not make peace with you, but war, then let it be shut in on all sides:
20:13 And when the Lord your God has given it into your hands, let every male in it be put to death without mercy.
20:14 But the women and the children and the cattle and everything in the town and all its wealth, you may take for yourselves: the wealth of your haters, which the Lord your God has given you, will be your food.
20:15 So you are to do to all the towns far away, which are not the towns of these nations.
20:16 But in the towns of these peoples whose land the Lord your God is giving you for your heritage, let no living thing be kept from death:
Deuteronomy 7:1 When the Lord your God takes you into the land where you are going, which is to be your heritage, and has sent out the nations before you, the Hittites and the Girgashites and the Amorites and the Canaanites and the Perizzites and the Hivites and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and stronger than you;
7:2 And when the Lord has given them up into your hands and you have overcome them, give them up to complete destruction: make no agreement with them, and have no mercy on them:
7:3 Do not take wives or husbands from among them; do not give your daughters to their sons, or take their daughters for your sons.
7:6 For you are a holy people to the Lord your God: marked out by the Lord your God to be his special people out of all the nations on the face of the earth.
7:7 The Lord did not give you his love or take you for himself because you were more in number than any other people; for you were the smallest of the nations:
7:14 You will have greater blessings than any other people: no male or female among you or among your cattle will be without offspring.
7:15 And the Lord will take away from you all disease, and will not put on you any of the evil diseases of Egypt which you have seen, but will put them on your haters.
7:16 And you are to send destruction on all the peoples which the Lord your God gives into your hands; have no pity on them, and do not give worship to their gods; for that will be a cause of sin to you.
Ezekiel 39:17 And you, son of man, this is what the Lord has said: Say to the birds of every sort and to all the beasts of the field, Get together and come; come together on every side to the offering which I am putting to death for you, a great offering on the mountains of Israel, so that you may have flesh for your food and blood for your drink.
39:18 The flesh of the men of war will be your food, and your drink the blood of the princes of the earth, of sheep and lambs, of he-goats, of oxen, all of them fat beasts of Bashan.
39:19 You will go on feasting on the fat till you are full, and drinking the blood till you are overcome with it, of my offering which I have put to death for you.
Isaiah 34:1 Come near, you nations, and give ear; take note, you peoples: let the earth and everything in it give ear; the world and all those living in it.
34:2 For the Lord is angry with all the nations, and his wrath is burning against all their armies: he has put them to the curse, he has given them to destruction.
34:3 Their dead bodies will be thick on the face of the earth, and their smell will come up, and the mountains will be flowing with their blood, and all the hills will come to nothing.
34:4 And the heavens will be rolled together like the roll of a book: and all their army will be gone, like a dead leaf from the vine, or a dry fruit from the fig-tree.
34:5 For my sword in heaven is full of wrath: see, it is coming down on Edom, in punishment on the people of my curse.
34:6 The sword of the Lord is full of blood, it is fat with the best of the meat, with the blood of lambs and goats, with the best parts of the sheep: for the Lord has a feast in Bozrah, and much cattle will be put to death in the land of Edom.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Believe me, Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican, when I compare this "Inhuman Racial Bloody Thought" with what Jesus Christ came with like:
Romans13-9: Have love for your neighbour as for yourself.
Matthew 5:44: But I say to you, Have love for those who are against you, and make prayer for those who are cruel to you;
Matthew 5:39: But I say to you, Do not make use of force against an evil man; but to him who gives you a blow on the right side of your face let the left be turned.
Romans 12:19: Do not give punishment for wrongs done to you, dear brothers, but give way to the wrath of God; for it is said in the holy Writings, Punishment is mine, I will give reward, says the Lord.
1Cornithians: 4:12 And with our hands we do the hardest work: when they give us curses we give blessings, when we undergo punishment we take it quietly;
4:13 When evil things are said about us we give gentle answers: we are made as the unclean things of the world, as that for which no one has any use, even till now.
Romans 12:14 Give blessing and not curses to those who are cruel to you
1Peter: 3:9 Not giving back evil for evil, or curse for curse, but in place of cursing, blessing; because this is the purpose of God for you that you may have a heritage of blessing.
Romans: 12:18 As far as it is possible for you be at peace with all men.
Romans: 12:20 But if one who has hate for you is in need of food or of drink, give it to him, for in so doing you will put coals of fire on his head.
12:21 Do not let evil overcome you, but overcome evil by good.
When I compare the "Inhuman Racial Bloody Thought" in the Old Testament with the deeds of your Church, you Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican in Annihilating nations of America, Australia, Neo Zealand, and Africa, and that which the West does by the blessing of its churches of different kinds of weapons even the internationally prohibited against Muslims and non-Muslims and other vulnerable nations.
I conclude, certainly, you, the Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican, you and your churches and your people have no relations with Jesus Christ peace be upon him.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To speak slander against Islam, Muslims and its civilization, it isn't a new subject. It appears with the beginning of Islam and extends along its history. Verily, Islam achieves the greatest victories through rising of slanders and challenges. Islam propagates in the home land of Christian Civilization- the civilization of the Supreme Pontiff of the Vatican with the weakness of Islamic governments – isn't but a truthful testimony upon this fact of the facts of this religion (Islam).
Islam makes the East free of the Roman Cultural Oppression for ten centuries, when his Church (of the Supreme Pontiff) practiced religious persecution of Eastern Christianity as it goes the example in history of religious persecution till the Eastern Churches dating its Martyrdom Era by the years of persecution.
Because of freedom of Eastern Land and people conscious by the Islamic Openings, and also the treasures which appeared as a big Bit in the mouth of looting and exploitation of the Western Roman. From that time on, hostility of the West to Islam begins and continues up till now and about this fact-in history of Western/Eastern Problem-the English General Sir John Bagot Glubb, (1897-1986 A.D.) said: The date of the Middle East Problem was returned back to the 7th century A.D.! Because of this fact, the history of Western, religious, and political foundations dominance is the date of the exerted efforts to regain the East which was kidnapped by Islam.
After the ten centuries which the Islamic Openings folded front its black pages, the West returned again to kidnap the East from Islamic freedom. Therefore, the West came by the Crusades, which had been extended for two centuries. When the Islamic Horsemanship Nations defeated these Crusades and swept its presence (its forts) from the East, the West returned back again after fall of Granada (1492 A.D.) and uprooted Islam from Andalusia back to rise Modern Crusades to surround Islamic World towards Arabic Heart by the battle of Bonaparte, (1769-1821 A.D.), the West occupied the most of the lands of Islam in this battle, which began since more than five centuries. It means, we are in front of 17 centuries of Western conquest of the East. In the written history 24 centuries!
In the Church of the Supreme Pontiff practiced spoke slander in the past against the Eastern Christianity, it practiced aggression on Islam in a long history. So, we are not surprise of the contemporary slander, because it is an extension to a long history of slanders.
Here, we intend to extract a lesson as a New Chapter of slander against Islam, that the Pact really gathered and still gathering the Catholic Western Church with the Western Imperial Project since the end of the World War II and the rise of the Cold War between the Western Capitalism and Communism in the middle of the 20th century.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the leadership of U.S. imperialism emerging on the ruins of European traditional colonial emperors, U.S. decided using the weapon of "Religion"-all against –and its grand institutes in its battle-cold and hot-with its opponents. U.S. allied with Zionism against Arabs and Muslims and against Communism then:
U.S. estimated the "World Council of Churches" or the "Ecumenical Union of Churches", on 1948 A.D. and used it in its Cold War against Communism and the Socialist Camp.
The U.S. imperialism in annexation of the Catholic Church in the war against Communism and the Soviet Union., the role of the Pope of the Vatican, John Paul II, (1921-2005 A.D.) in this American-Vaticanous Alliance was very noticeable, famous, and effective.
The U.S. imperialism succeeded in annexation of the Coptic Orthodox Church to the "World Council of Churches" at time of the Pope Shenouda III after long famous Coptic resistance.
This U.S. imperialism employed Islamic Religion in its imperial profited investigation in Baghdad Pact )the Central Pact) on 1955 which extended to Afghan Jihad against Soviet in the eighties of the 20th century.
After the falling of Communism in the beginning of the last decade of the 20th century, the Western Imperialism declared –under the leadership of America- that Islam is an enemy replacing Communism and called it "the Green Danger" which replaced the "Red Danger". And from that time on, the American Imperialism turned all its systemic institutions to the war on Islam and Muslims till the opportunity following the events of September 11, 2001, which made its (U.S.) ideological address announces-plainly-that war against Islam is a "Crusade" against evils and its axis, and against "Islamofascism". They declared, they want Islam vacuumed of its meaning. They want Islam like Christianity (i.e. only rituals) and all Islamic land and Muslim treasures are for the American Caesar, to its military basics, its intercontinental and national monopoly companies. Therefore, the American-Zionistic writer, Tomas Friedman, announced on 2001 A.D. after the American invasion of Afghanistan that: "The real true war in Islamic land is in schools, then we must end this military campaign quickly to return back armed with books to form a new generation to accept our politics as it likes our Hot dogs.". This means, the true war is against Islamic education Curricula, to vacuum it from spirit of resistance and Jihad against invaders. The American strategic thinker, Fukuyama, announced that the Islamic world defers from others of civilizations in one very important point which revive frequently during the last years, very important basic movements which reject not only the Western Politics, but the Basic most important principal of the "Modern West": the religion tolerance, secularism itself. Therefore, the current conflict is not easy like any battle against "Terrorism" as the American government prevails, but it is a conflict against Islamic Creed, Islamofascism which is against the Modern West. Therefore, the Islamic society must decide which of either to be peacefully with the Modern West especially concerning the basic principal of the Secular Nation.
This is the real true battle and these are its institutes and within this frame, we must look at the new chapter of fabrications of the Pope of the Vatican-Benedictius XVI against Islam. It is not only a lecture the Pope of the Vatican made lied on the Divine and on the Prophet of Islam Peace be upon him and on the Holy Quran and Islamic Jihad. It is not only a must apology from the man (the Pope) to Muslims, when it happened we will be calm, but we are in front of an employment of Islam by U.S. imperial West and primarily- the Catholic Church against Islam, also the its employment during the conflict against Communism. America succeeds in dragging the Western Catholic Church, at the time of the ex-Pope, John Paul II-to the battle against Communism and today, after replacing Islam as an enemy instead of Communism by employing the Catholic Church under the leadership of the Pope Benedictius XVI to the war against Islam.
This is the "Truth" we must be aware of and the Islamic mind to deal with. We are not in front of a "Slip of a thought" by the Supreme pontiff of the Vatican, even not in front of "Awkward position" as the American Newsweek describes it-in dealing with Islam – but we are in front of one of the numerous, fierce, and the successive challenges which filled our long history and confronting the fierce challenges, the precious and steal metal of the nation appears, History taught us that! And in confronting challenges and to win victorious over it, we must arrange prioritization of the Muslim mind and Order Paper potentials which Muslims belong. Managing to confront and rise, and managing our potentials we the Ummah (the Muslim Nation) collect the causes to stand firm and rise and win victory.
We must remember at the end of this study, the words of Salah Eddin Al-Ayyoubi, (532-589 Hijri/1137-1193 A.D.) which he wrote to the King , Richard, the Lion heart, (1157-1199A.D.) which is as follows: Jerusalem is our inheritance as it is yours. From Jerusalem our Prophet Peace be upon him ascend to heaven, and in Jerusalem angels gathered. We can not give up as a Muslim nation- but about the land, your occupation is temporal and it happened because Muslims who lived in became weak. You cannot build even a stone in this land as Jihad continues. The Prophet peace be upon him said: You must be in Jihad because it is the Priesthood of Islam. Related by Ahmad. He (peace be upon him)said also: The one who murdered in defense of his money, he is a martyr. He who murdered in defense of his religion, he is a martyr. And he who murdered in defense of his family, he is a martyr. Related by Al-Termidhi.
Peace upon who follows the guidance, O the Supreme Pontiff of the Vatcan.
